mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curriculum-Based Strategies for Efficient Cross-Domain Action Recognition

arXiv 2601.14101 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite significant progress in human action recognition, generalizing to diverse viewpoints remains a challenge. Most existing datasets are captured from ground-level perspectives, and models trained on them often struggle to transfer to drastically different domains such as aerial views. This paper examines how curriculum-based training strategies can improve generalization to unseen real aerial-view data without using any real aerial data during training. We explore curriculum learning for cross-view action recognition using two out-of-domain sources: synthetic aerial-view data and real ground-view data. Our results on the evaluation on order of training (fine-tuning on synthetic aerial data vs. real ground data) shows that fine-tuning on real ground data but differ in how they transition from synthetic to real. The first uses a two-stage curriculum with direct fine-tuning, while the second applies a progressive curriculum that expands the dataset in multiple stages before fine-tuning. We evaluate both methods on the REMAG dataset using SlowFast (CNN-based) and MViTv2 (Transformer-based) architectures. Results show that combining the two out-of-domain datasets clearly outperforms training on a single domain, whether real ground-view or synthetic aerial-view. Both curriculum strategies match the top-1 accuracy of simple dataset combination while offering efficiency gains. With the two-step fine-tuning method, SlowFast achieves up to a 37% reduction in iterations and MViTv2 up to a 30% reduction compared to simple combination. The multi-step progressive approach further reduces iterations, by up to 9% for SlowFast and 30% for MViTv2, relative to the two-step method. These findings demonstrate that curriculum-based training can maintain comparable performance (top-1 accuracy within 3% range) while improving training efficiency in cross-view action recognition.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

17 of 24 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  2. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  3. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  4. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,090
  5. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  6. 2019VIBE: Video Inference for Human Body Pose and Shape Estimationcited by 615
  7. 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 516
  8. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 516
  9. 2018Learning 3D Human Dynamics from Videocited by 315
  10. 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
  11. 2017Curriculum Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Urban Scenescited by 105
  12. 2021UAV-Human: A Large Benchmark for Human Behavior Understanding with Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 95
5 more
  1. 2019Synthetic Humans for Action Recognition from Unseen Viewpointscited by 46
  2. 2023Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlationcited by 39
  3. 2016Procedural Generation of Videos to Train Deep Action Recognition Networkscited by 31
  4. 2023Synthetic-to-Real Domain Adaptation for Action Recognition: A Dataset and Baseline Performancescited by 15
  5. 2022Progressive Transformation Learning for Leveraging Virtual Images in Trainingcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.