mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2408.07471 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2024cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct preference optimization (DPO), a widely adopted offline preference optimization algorithm, aims to align large language models (LLMs) with human-desired behaviors using pairwise preference data. However, the generation of the winning response and the losing response within pairwise data are typically isolated, leading to weak correlations between them as well as suboptimal alignment performance. To address this issue, we propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC. Firstly, we increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications, synthesizing a pseudo-winning response by improving the losing response with the winning response as a reference. Secondly, we identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations. Therefore, we propose learning token-level correlations by dynamically leveraging the policy model's confidence during training. Comprehensive experiments on QA, math, and instruction-following tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, significantly surpassing competitive baselines, including DPO. Additionally, our in-depth quantitative analysis reveals the reasons behind our method's superior performance over DPO and showcases its versatility to other DPO variants. We release our repository at https://github.com/YJiangcm/BMC.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 41 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2024.

Builds on

41 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  3. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  4. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  5. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  6. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization2 Feb
  7. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment7 Nov
  8. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  9. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  10. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  11. 2023Preference-grounded Token-level Guidance for Language Model Fine-tuning1 Jun
  12. 2023Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback23 May
3 more
  1. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
  3. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec

Other references · 26

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  9. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  11. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  12. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
14 more
  1. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  2. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
  3. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  4. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  5. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  6. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 347
  7. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
  8. 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
  9. 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 159
  10. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 91
  11. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 77
  12. 2023Efficient RLHF: Reducing the Memory Usage of PPOcited by 40
  13. 2024Improving Large Language Models via Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning with Minimum Editing Constraintcited by 39
  14. 2023CoachLM: Automatic Instruction Revisions Improve the Data Quality in LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025When Data is the Algorithm: A Systematic Study and Curation of Preference Optimization Datasets
  2. 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
  3. 2024Curry-DPO: Enhancing Alignment using Curriculum Learning & Ranked Preferences
  4. 2025What Matters in Data for DPO?
  5. 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective
  6. 2024Multi-Preference Optimization: Generalizing DPO via Set-Level Contrasts
  7. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  8. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection