Finally Outshining the Random Baseline: A Simple and Effective Solution for Active Learning in 3D Biomedical Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning (AL) has the potential to drastically reduce annotation costs in 3D biomedical image segmentation, where expert labeling of volumetric data is both time-consuming and expensive. Yet, existing AL methods are unable to consistently outperform improved random sampling baselines adapted to 3D data, leaving the field without a reliable solution. We introduce Class-stratified Scheduled Power Predictive Entropy (ClaSP PE), a simple and effective query strategy that addresses two key limitations of standard uncertainty-based AL methods: class imbalance and redundancy in early selections. ClaSP PE combines class-stratified querying to ensure coverage of underrepresented structures and log-scale power noising with a decaying schedule to enforce query diversity in early-stage AL and encourage exploitation later. In our evaluation on 24 experimental settings using four 3D biomedical datasets within the comprehensive nnActive benchmark, ClaSP PE is the only method that generally outperforms improved random baselines in terms of both segmentation quality with statistically significant gains, whilst remaining annotation efficient. Furthermore, we explicitly simulate the real-world application by testing our method on four previously unseen datasets without manual adaptation, where all experiment parameters are set according to predefined guidelines. The results confirm that ClaSP PE robustly generalizes to novel tasks without requiring dataset-specific tuning. Within the nnActive framework, we present compelling evidence that an AL method can consistently outperform random baselines adapted to 3D segmentation, in terms of both performance and annotation efficiency in a realistic, close-to-production scenario. Our open-source implementation and clear deployment guidelines make it readily applicable in practice. Code is at https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnActive.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.
Builds on
37 of 58 references.
References · 37
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
- 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
- 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
- 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 351
- 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 240
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
25 more
- 2020Shape-aware Semi-supervised 3D Semantic Segmentation for Medical Imagescited by 152
- 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 108
- 2023The KiTS21 Challenge: Automatic segmentation of kidneys, renal tumors, and renal cysts in corticomedullary-phase CTcited by 103
- 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 89
- 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 54
- 2018Learning to Segment Medical Images with Scribble-Supervision Alonecited by 48
- 2021Diminishing Uncertainty within the Training Pool: Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
- 2025nnInteractive: Redefining 3D Promptable Segmentationcited by 41
- 2022MONAI Label: A framework for AI-assisted Interactive Labeling of 3D Medical Imagescited by 39
- 2019Parting with Illusions about Deep Active Learningcited by 38
- 2021Effective Evaluation of Deep Active Learning on Image Classification Taskscited by 37
- 2021Stochastic Batch Acquisition: A Simple Baseline for Deep Active Learningcited by 36
- 2024Revisiting MAE pre-training for 3D medical image segmentationcited by 35
- 2023Navigating the Pitfalls of Active Learning Evaluation: A Systematic Framework for Meaningful Performance Assessmentcited by 26
- 2024ScribFormer: Transformer Makes CNN Work Better for Scribble-based Medical Image Segmentationcited by 24
- 2023Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batchescited by 21
- 2024Revisiting Active Learning in the Era of Vision Foundation Modelscited by 14
- 2023TAAL: Test-time Augmentation for Active Learning in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
- 2023COLosSAL: A Benchmark for Cold-start Active Learning for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
- 2024Breaking the Barrier: Selective Uncertainty-based Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
- 2024Integrating Deep Metric Learning with Coreset for Active Learning in 3D Segmentationcited by 8
- 2022Less Is More: A Comparison of Active Learning Strategies for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 7
- 2024Beyond Pixel-Wise Supervision for Medical Image Segmentation: From Traditional Models to Foundation Modelscited by 4
- 2024Predictive Accuracy-Based Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 4
- 2025nnActive: A Framework for Evaluation of Active Learning in 3D Biomedical Segmentationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.