mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Active Learning in the Era of Vision Foundation Models

arXiv 2401.14555 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 14

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation vision or vision-language models are trained on large unlabeled or noisy data and learn robust representations that can achieve impressive zero- or few-shot performance on diverse tasks. Given these properties, they are a natural fit for active learning (AL), which aims to maximize labeling efficiency. However, the full potential of foundation models has not been explored in the context of AL, specifically in the low-budget regime. In this work, we evaluate how foundation models influence three critical components of effective AL, namely, 1) initial labeled pool selection, 2) ensuring diverse sampling, and 3) the trade-off between representative and uncertainty sampling. We systematically study how the robust representations of foundation models (DINOv2, OpenCLIP) challenge existing findings in active learning. Our observations inform the principled construction of a new simple and elegant AL strategy that balances uncertainty estimated via dropout with sample diversity. We extensively test our strategy on many challenging image classification benchmarks, including natural images as well as out-of-domain biomedical images that are relatively understudied in the AL literature. We also provide a highly performant and efficient implementation of modern AL strategies (including our method) at https://github.com/sanketx/AL-foundation-models.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.

Builds on

30 of 56 references.

References · 30

  1. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  4. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  5. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  6. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
  7. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  8. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
  9. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  10. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  11. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 352
  12. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
18 more
  1. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 133
  2. 2022Contrastive Masked Autoencoders are Stronger Vision Learnerscited by 133
  3. 2020Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language Modelingcited by 128
  4. 2019Consistency-based Semi-supervised Active Learning: Towards Minimizing Labeling Costcited by 114
  5. 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
  6. 2022Active Learning Through a Covering Lenscited by 66
  7. 2022Active Learning by Feature Mixingcited by 63
  8. 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 54
  9. 2019Rethinking deep active learning: Using unlabeled data at model trainingcited by 39
  10. 2021Low Budget Active Learning via Wasserstein Distance: An Integer Programming Approachcited by 34
  11. 2022Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Taskcited by 33
  12. 2023Navigating the Pitfalls of Active Learning Evaluation: A Systematic Framework for Meaningful Performance Assessmentcited by 26
  13. 2013An empirical analysis of dropout in piecewise linear networkscited by 19
  14. 2020On the Marginal Benefit of Active Learning: Does Self-Supervision Eat Its Cake?cited by 18
  15. 2020On Initial Pools for Deep Active Learningcited by 18
  16. 2021A Simple Baseline for Low-Budget Active Learningcited by 15
  17. 2021Active Learning in Bayesian Neural Networks with Balanced Entropy Learning Principlecited by 14
  18. 2021Self-supervised Semi-supervised Learning for Data Labeling and Quality Evaluationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PCoreSet: Effective Active Learning through Knowledge Distillation from Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Are foundation models for computer vision good conformal predictors?
  3. 2026Underrepresented in Foundation Model Pretraining Data? A One-Shot Probe
  4. 2024Active Learning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Active Learning via Vision-Language Model Adaptation with Open Data
  6. 2023Active Prompt Learning in Vision Language Models
  7. 2025Boosting Active Learning with Knowledge Transfer
  8. 2026Active Zero: Self-Evolving Vision-Language Models through Active Environment Exploration