mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SpaRRTa: A Synthetic Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Visual Foundation Models

arXiv 2601.11729 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Foundation Models (VFMs), such as DINO and CLIP, excel in semantic understanding of images but exhibit limited spatial reasoning capabilities, which limits their applicability to embodied systems. As a result, recent work incorporates some 3D tasks (such as depth estimation) into VFM training. However, VFM performance remains inconsistent across other spatial tasks, raising the question of whether these models truly have spatial awareness or overfit to specific 3D objectives. To address this question, we introduce the Spatial Relation Recognition Task (SpaRRTa) benchmark, which evaluates the ability of VFMs to identify relative positions of objects in the image. Unlike traditional 3D objectives that focus on precise metric prediction (e.g., surface normal estimation), SpaRRTa probes a fundamental capability underpinning more advanced forms of human-like spatial understanding. SpaRRTa generates an arbitrary number of photorealistic images with diverse scenes and fully controllable object arrangements, along with freely accessible spatial annotations. Evaluating a range of state-of-the-art VFMs, we reveal significant disparities between their spatial reasoning abilities. Through our analysis, we provide insights into the mechanisms that support or hinder spatial awareness in modern VFMs. We hope that SpaRRTa will serve as a useful tool for guiding the development of future spatially aware visual models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 53 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.

Builds on

53 of 84 references.

References · 53

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  6. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  7. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  8. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
  9. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  10. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,803
  11. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  12. 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,567
38 more
  1. 2025VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 1,539
  2. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  3. 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,376
  4. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
  5. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,191
  6. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  7. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  8. 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 983
  9. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  10. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
  11. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 715
  12. 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 689
  13. 2021Common Objects in 3D: Large-Scale Learning and Evaluation of Real-life 3D Category Reconstructioncited by 652
  14. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
  15. 2021Masked Feature Prediction for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 576
  16. 2025Continuous 3D Perception Model with Persistent Statecited by 548
  17. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  18. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
  19. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 326
  20. 2022MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoderscited by 291
  21. 20243D Reconstruction with Spatial Memorycited by 277
  22. 2023Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?cited by 218
  23. 2020RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platformcited by 193
  24. 2024Probing the 3D Awareness of Visual Foundation Modelscited by 177
  25. 2022CroCo v2: Improved Cross-view Completion Pre-training for Stereo Matching and Optical Flowcited by 166
  26. 2022CroCo: Self-Supervised Pre-training for 3D Vision Tasks by Cross-View Completioncited by 160
  27. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 153
  28. 2025MUSt3R: Multi-view Network for Stereo 3D Reconstructioncited by 141
  29. 2025RayZer: A Self-supervised Large View Synthesis Modelcited by 77
  30. 2024Learning by Reconstruction Produces Uninformative Features For Perceptioncited by 55
  31. 2023NAVI: Category-Agnostic Image Collections with High-Quality 3D Shape and Pose Annotationscited by 53
  32. 2025IntPhys 2: Benchmarking Intuitive Physics Understanding In Complex Synthetic Environmentscited by 52
  33. 2023Is ImageNet worth 1 video? Learning strong image encoders from 1 long unlabelled videocited by 40
  34. 2024SPA: 3D Spatial-Awareness Enables Effective Embodied Representationcited by 28
  35. 2023Keep It SimPool: Who Said Supervised Transformers Suffer from Attention Deficit?cited by 16
  36. 2024The 3D-PC: a benchmark for visual perspective taking in humans and machinescited by 16
  37. 2025Attention, Please! Revisiting Attentive Probing Through the Lens of Efficiencycited by 11
  38. 2024Probing the Mid-level Vision Capabilities of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 7

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models: Benchmarking Object-Centric Spatial Understanding
  2. 2026Thinking in Structures: Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Constraint-Governed Spaces
  3. 2025Towards Physics-informed Spatial Intelligence with Human Priors: An Autonomous Driving Pilot Study
  4. 2025MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence
  5. 2025Evaluating Foundation Models' 3D Understanding Through Multi-View Correspondence Analysis
  6. 2026SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models