mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search

arXiv 2601.07296 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical capabilities in mathematical domains, their application to the legal field remains hindered by the strict requirements for procedural rigor and adherence to legal logic. Existing legal LLMs, which rely on "closed-loop reasoning" derived solely from internal parametric knowledge, frequently suffer from lack of self-awareness regarding their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect conclusions. To address this challenge, we present Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search (LRAS), the first framework designed to transition legal LLMs from static and parametric "closed-loop thinking" to dynamic and interactive "Active Inquiry". By integrating Introspective Imitation Learning and Difficulty-aware Reinforcement Learning, LRAS enables LRMs to identify knowledge boundaries and handle legal reasoning complexity. Empirical results demonstrate that LRAS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 8.2-32%, with the most substantial gains observed in tasks requiring deep reasoning with reliable knowledge. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.

Builds on

16 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LexChain: Modeling Legal Reasoning Chains for Chinese Tort Case Analysis20 Oct
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Tool-Integrated Interleaved Thinking towards Cross-Domain Generalization13 Oct
  3. 2025GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction22 Aug
  4. 2025LegalDelta: Enhancing Legal Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Thought Guided Information Gain17 Aug
  5. 2025Can Group Relative Policy Optimization Improve Thai Legal Reasoning and Question Answering?13 Jul
  6. 2025Legal Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs: Procedural Alignment through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning3 Apr

Other references · 10

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  4. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
  5. 2023DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Servicescited by 117
  6. 2025Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Improving Factuality in Legal Question Answeringcited by 28
  7. 2025LLMs Provide Unstable Answers to Legal Questionscited by 19
  8. 2025LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment Reasoningcited by 9
  9. 2025Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 9
  10. 2025Towards Advanced Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs via First-Order Logic Theorem Provingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration
  2. 2025Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoning
  3. 2025Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference
  4. 2026Investigating Multi-Agent Deliberation in Law
  5. 2023Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models to Facilitate Legal Applications
  6. 2025An Explicit Syllogistic Legal Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models
  7. 2026Adaptive Collaboration of Arena-Based Argumentative LLMs for Explainable and Contestable Legal Reasoning
  8. 2026Closing the Loop: Formally Verified Law as a Reward Signal for Self-Improving Legal AI