mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SP-Rank: A Dataset for Ranked Preferences with Secondary Information

arXiv 2601.05253 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.IR cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce SP-Rank, the first large-scale, publicly available dataset for benchmarking algorithms that leverage both first-order preferences and second-order predictions in ranking tasks. Each datapoint includes a personal vote (first-order signal) and a meta-prediction of how others will vote (second-order signal), allowing richer modeling than traditional datasets that capture only individual preferences. SP-Rank contains over 12,000 human-generated datapoints across three domains -- geography, movies, and paintings, and spans nine elicitation formats with varying subset sizes. This structure enables empirical analysis of preference aggregation when expert identities are unknown but presumed to exist, and individual votes represent noisy estimates of a shared ground-truth ranking. We benchmark SP-Rank by comparing traditional aggregation methods that use only first-order votes against SP-Voting, a second-order method that jointly reasons over both signals to infer ground-truth rankings. While SP-Rank also supports models that rely solely on second-order predictions, our benchmarks emphasize the gains from combining both signals. We evaluate performance across three core tasks: (1) full ground-truth rank recovery, (2) subset-level rank recovery, and (3) probabilistic modeling of voter behavior. Results show that incorporating second-order signals substantially improves accuracy over vote-only methods. Beyond social choice, SP-Rank supports downstream applications in learning-to-rank, extracting expert knowledge from noisy crowds, and training reward models in preference-based fine-tuning pipelines. We release the dataset, code, and baseline evaluations (available at https://github.com/amrit19/SP-Rank-Dataset ) to foster research in human preference modeling, aggregation theory, and human-AI alignment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

8 of 31 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Eliciting Expertise without Verificationcited by 11
  2. 2021The Wisdom of the Crowd and Higher-Order Beliefscited by 8
  3. 2023Calibrating "Cheap Signals" in Peer Review without a Priorcited by 8
  4. 2021Wisdom of the Crowd Voting: Truthful Aggregation of Voter Information and Preferencescited by 7
  5. 2021Surprisingly Popular Voting Recovers Rankings, Surprisingly!cited by 4
  6. 2024The Surprising Effectiveness of SP Voting with Partial Preferencescited by 4
  7. 2022Rank Aggregation Using Scoring Rulescited by 2
  8. 2019Machine Truth Serumcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Population-Level Generative Modeling for Ranking Data
  2. 2025When Less Is More: Binary Feedback Can Outperform Ordinal Comparisons in Ranking Recovery
  3. 2024Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings
  4. 2026Prompt-Dependent Ranking of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Quantification
  5. 2026Democratic Preference Alignment via Sortition-Weighted RLHF
  6. 2025The Limits of Preference Data for Post-Training
  7. 2025ResponseRank: Data-Efficient Reward Modeling through Preference Strength Learning
  8. 2019Rank Aggregation via Heterogeneous Thurstone Preference Models