Rank Aggregation via Heterogeneous Thurstone Preference Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose the Heterogeneous Thurstone Model (HTM) for aggregating ranked data, which can take the accuracy levels of different users into account. By allowing different noise distributions, the proposed HTM model maintains the generality of Thurstone's original framework, and as such, also extends the Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model for pairwise comparisons to heterogeneous populations of users. Under this framework, we also propose a rank aggregation algorithm based on alternating gradient descent to estimate the underlying item scores and accuracy levels of different users simultaneously from noisy pairwise comparisons. We theoretically prove that the proposed algorithm converges linearly up to a statistical error which matches that of the state-of-the-art method for the single-user BTL model. We evaluate the proposed HTM model and algorithm on both synthetic and real data, demonstrating that it outperforms existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022Stochastic Contextual Dueling Bandits under Linear Stochastic Transitivity Modelscited by 35
- 2024A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregationcited by 23
- 2021Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problemscited by 19
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification of MLE for Entity Ranking with Covariatescited by 16
- 2021ℓ∞-Bounds of the MLE in the BTL Model under General Comparison Graphscited by 8
- 2024Human-LLM Hybrid Text Answer Aggregation for Crowd Annotationscited by 4
- 2021Adaptive Sampling for Heterogeneous Rank Aggregation from Noisy Pairwise Comparisonscited by 3
- 2023Robust Consensus in Ranking Data Analysis: Definitions, Properties and Computational Issuescited by 3
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problemcited by 0
- 2026Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 0
- 2026Finding the Signal in the Spam: Jointly Learning Rewards and Worker Reliability from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 0
- 2026DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibration25 Sep 2026
- 2026Finding the Signal in the Spam: Jointly Learning Rewards and Worker Reliability from Pairwise Comparisons10 Aug 2026
- 2026Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees3 Aug 2026
- 2024Human-LLM Hybrid Text Answer Aggregation for Crowd Annotations22 Oct 2024
- 2024A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregation18 Jan 2024
- 2023Ranking a Set of Objects using Heterogeneous Workers: QUITE an Easy Problem3 Oct 2023
- 2023Robust Consensus in Ranking Data Analysis: Definitions, Properties and Computational Issues22 Mar 2023
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification of MLE for Entity Ranking with Covariates20 Dec 2022
- 2022Stochastic Contextual Dueling Bandits under Linear Stochastic Transitivity Models9 Feb 2022
- 2021ℓ∞-Bounds of the MLE in the BTL Model under General Comparison Graphs20 Oct 2021
- 2021Adaptive Sampling for Heterogeneous Rank Aggregation from Noisy Pairwise Comparisons8 Oct 2021
- 2021Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems1 Oct 2021
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026How Many Repeated Pairwise Comparisons Are Needed for Ranking under Heterogeneity?
- 2025SP-Rank: A Dataset for Ranked Preferences with Secondary Information
- 2022Ranking Inferences Based on the Top Choice of Multiway Comparisons
- 2026Nonparametric LLM Evaluation from Preference Data
- 2023Spectral Ranking Inferences based on General Multiway Comparisons
- 2024Covariate Assisted Entity Ranking with Sparse Intrinsic Scores
- 2025When Less Is More: Binary Feedback Can Outperform Ordinal Comparisons in Ranking Recovery
- 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Ranking