Eliciting Expertise without Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A central question of crowd-sourcing is how to elicit expertise from agents. This is even more difficult when answers cannot be directly verified. A key challenge is that sophisticated agents may strategically withhold effort or information when they believe their payoff will be based upon comparison with other agents whose reports will likely omit this information due to lack of effort or expertise. Our work defines a natural model for this setting based on the assumption that more sophisticated agents know the beliefs of less sophisticated agents. We then provide a mechanism design framework for this setting. From this framework, we design several novel mechanisms, for both the single and multiple question settings, that (1) encourage agents to invest effort and provide their information honestly; (2) output a correct "hierarchy" of the information when agents are rational.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standardcited by 19
- 2024Eliciting Informative Text Evaluations with Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2024ElicitationGPT: Text Elicitation Mechanisms via Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixingcited by 5
- 2024Spot Check Equivalence: an Interpretable Metric for Information Elicitation Mechanismscited by 4
- 2021Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Reviewcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating LLM-Contaminated Crowdsourcing Data Without Ground Truthcited by 2
- 2024Surprisingly Popular Voting for Concentric Rank-Order Modelscited by 0
- 2025Improving Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Detection through Ensemble-Based Models and Synthetic Oversampling Techniquescited by 0
- 2025SP-Rank: A Dataset for Ranked Preferences with Secondary Informationcited by 0
- 2026Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilitiescited by 0
- 2026Likelihood scoring for continuations of mathematical text: a self-supervised benchmark with tests for shortcut vulnerabilities11 May 2026
- 2025SP-Rank: A Dataset for Ranked Preferences with Secondary Information17 Oct 2025
- 2025Improving Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Detection through Ensemble-Based Models and Synthetic Oversampling Techniques1 Oct 2025
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixing14 Sep 2025
- 2025Evaluating LLM-Contaminated Crowdsourcing Data Without Ground Truth8 Jun 2025
- 2024Surprisingly Popular Voting for Concentric Rank-Order Models13 Nov 2024
- 2024Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standard11 Nov 2024
- 2024ElicitationGPT: Text Elicitation Mechanisms via Language Models13 Jun 2024
- 2024Eliciting Informative Text Evaluations with Large Language Models23 May 2024
- 2024Spot Check Equivalence: an Interpretable Metric for Information Elicitation Mechanisms21 Feb 2024
- 2021Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review27 Aug 2021