mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering

arXiv 2601.03595 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit human-like cognitive reasoning strategies (eg backtracking, cross-verification) during the reasoning process, which improves their performance on complex tasks. Currently, reasoning strategies are autonomously selected by LRMs themselves. However, such autonomous selection often produces inefficient or even erroneous reasoning paths. To make reasoning more reliable and flexible, it is important to develop methods for controlling reasoning strategies. Existing methods struggle to control fine-grained reasoning strategies due to conceptual entanglement in LRMs' hidden states. To address this, we leverage Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to decompose strategy-entangled hidden states into a disentangled feature space. To identify the few strategy-specific features from the vast pool of SAE features, we propose SAE-Steering, an efficient two-stage feature identification pipeline. SAE-Steering first recalls features that amplify the logits of strategy-specific keywords, filtering out over 99% of features, and then ranks the remaining features by their control effectiveness. Using the identified strategy-specific features as control vectors, SAE-Steering outperforms existing methods by over 15% in control effectiveness. Furthermore, controlling reasoning strategies can redirect LRMs from erroneous paths to correct ones, achieving a 7% absolute accuracy improvement. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Peter-Fy/SAE-Steering.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.

Builds on

16 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Survey of Slow Thinking-based Reasoning LLMs using Reinforced Learning and Inference-time Scaling Law5 May
  2. 2025Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention31 Mar
  3. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  4. 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Jan

Other references · 12

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  6. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  7. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
  8. 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 110
  9. 2025DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's think about LLM Reasoningcited by 91
  10. 2025Trading Inference-Time Compute for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 60
  11. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
  12. 2025LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms
  2. 2025Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
  3. 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steering
  4. 2026Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretation
  5. 2026Agentic Chain-of-Thought Steering for Efficient and Controllable LLM Reasoning
  6. 2026Steering Large Reasoning Models towards Concise Reasoning via Flow Matching
  7. 2026Can We Break LLMs Out of Self-Loops? Fine-Grained Reasoning Control with Activation Steering
  8. 2026Beyond Dense States: Sparse Transcoders as Causally Testable Operators for LLM Latent Reasoning