mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling Interpretable Transformers with Parity Bottleneck Layers

arXiv 2607.20652 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models are thought to exhibit the phenomenon of superposition, representing many more features than dimensions in their residual streams. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are designed to recover such features post-hoc, but training models that are interpretable by construction has remained impractical, as a per-layer over-complete bottleneck is prohibitively expensive in both memory and compute. To overcome this issue, we introduce the ParityTransformer, a GPT-2-scale architecture whose intermediate representations are efficient and wide / sparse by design. At each layer, a Deep Parity Bottleneck (DPB) replaces a learned over-complete basis with a parameter-free algebraic dictionary, providing a deterministic incoherence guarantee and eliminating the memory requirements that have prevented per-layer interpretable bottlenecks at scale. A DPB is a hierarchically structured sparse bottleneck which efficiently enforces sparsity using a multi-level mixture-of-experts approach: a hardware-aware implementation that closes the cost gap between activation sparse and dense training to a manageable interpretability tax. Empirically, ParityTransformers perform at least as well as post-hoc SAEs on sparse probing tasks, while out-performing on measures of feature absorption, steering effectiveness, and fine-grained causal interventions. Because subsequent computation acts only on features that survive the sparse bottleneck, the ParityTransformer's features are native to the model's forwards pass by construction, addressing the question of whether SAEs probe features the model actually uses during computation. We see this as a step toward training models whose internal representations are interpretable by design rather than recovered post hoc.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

Builds on

32 of 50 references.

References · 32

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  2. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  4. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  7. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  8. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
  9. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  10. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  11. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  12. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
20 more
  1. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
  2. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 199
  3. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
  4. 2024Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Expertscited by 166
  5. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 136
  6. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 118
  7. 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Controlcited by 83
  8. 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Featurescited by 74
  9. 2023Codebook Features: Sparse and Discrete Interpretability for Neural Networkscited by 45
  10. 2025Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuitscited by 40
  11. 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoderscited by 38
  12. 2024Mathematical Models of Computation in Superpositioncited by 34
  13. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformerscited by 30
  14. 2024On the Complexity of Neural Computation in Superpositioncited by 21
  15. 2026Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steeringcited by 12
  16. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?cited by 10
  17. 2026Learning a Generative Meta-Model of LLM Activationscited by 8
  18. 2025The Dragon Hatchling: The Missing Link between the Transformer and Models of the Braincited by 6
  19. 2026Gemma Needs Help: Investigating and Mitigating Emotional Instability in LLMscited by 4
  20. 2025Brain network science modelling of sparse neural networks enables Transformers and LLMs to perform as fully connectedcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hidden Decoding at Scale: Latent Computation Scaling for Large Language Models
  2. 2025Improving Model Representation and Reducing KV Cache via Skip Connections with First Value Heads
  3. 2026Sparsely gated tiny linear experts
  4. 2024One-Step is Enough: Sparse Autoencoders for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  5. 2026Mixture of Chapters: Scaling Learnt Memory in Transformers
  6. 2024Monet: Mixture of Monosemantic Experts for Transformers
  7. 2026Capability-Guided Compression: Toward Interpretability-Aware Budget Allocation for Large Language Models
  8. 2025Beyond Redundancy: Diverse and Specialized Multi-Expert Sparse Autoencoder