mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Weighted Strategy for Non-stationary Parametric Bandits and MDPs

arXiv 2601.01069 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-stationary parametric bandits have attracted much attention recently. There are three principled ways to deal with non-stationarity, including sliding-window, weighted, and restart strategies. As many non-stationary environments exhibit gradual drifting patterns, the weighted strategy is commonly adopted in real-world applications. However, previous theoretical studies show that its analysis is more involved and the algorithms are either computationally less efficient or statistically suboptimal. This paper revisits the weighted strategy for non-stationary parametric bandits. In linear bandits (LB), we discover that this undesirable feature is due to an inadequate regret analysis, which results in an overly complex algorithm design. We propose a refined analysis framework, which simplifies the derivation and, importantly, produces a simpler weight-based algorithm that is as efficient as window/restart-based algorithms while retaining the same regret as previous studies. Furthermore, our new framework can be used to improve regret bounds of other parametric bandits, including Generalized Linear Bandits (GLB) and Self-Concordant Bandits (SCB). For example, we develop a simple weighted GLB algorithm with an tildeO(kμ5/4 cμ-3/4 d3/4 PT1/4T3/4) regret, improving the tildeO(kμ2 cμ-1d9/10 PT1/5T4/5) bound in prior work, where kμ and cμ characterize the reward model's nonlinearity, PT measures the non-stationarity, d and T denote the dimension and time horizon. Moreover, we extend our framework to non-stationary Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with function approximation, focusing on Linear Mixture MDP and Multinomial Logit (MNL) Mixture MDP. For both classes, we propose algorithms based on the weighted strategy and establish dynamic regret guarantees using our analysis framework.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2026.

Builds on

33 of 58 references.

References · 33

  1. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
  2. 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
  3. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 118
  4. 2021Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning without Prior Knowledge: An Optimal Black-box Approachcited by 98
  5. 2019Weighted Linear Bandits for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 86
  6. 2018Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 85
  7. 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
  8. 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 64
  9. 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 57
  10. 2021A Simple Approach for Non-stationary Linear Banditscited by 54
  11. 2022Open-environment Machine Learningcited by 48
  12. 2019Hedging the Drift: Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 46
21 more
  1. 2019On the Performance of Thompson Sampling on Logistic Banditscited by 32
  2. 2019Online Forecasting of Total-Variation-bounded Sequencescited by 31
  3. 2021Weighted Gaussian Process Bandits for Non-stationary Environmentscited by 30
  4. 2020Self-Concordant Analysis of Generalized Linear Bandits with Forgettingcited by 29
  5. 2022A New Look at Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Stochastic Banditscited by 28
  6. 2021Tracking Most Significant Arm Switches in Banditscited by 27
  7. 2015Online Stochastic Linear Optimization under One-bit Feedbackcited by 26
  8. 2020Efficient Learning in Non-Stationary Linear Markov Decision Processescited by 26
  9. 2020Algorithms for Non-Stationary Generalized Linear Banditscited by 24
  10. 2020IntelligentPooling: Practical Thompson Sampling for mHealthcited by 24
  11. 2022Non-Stationary Bandit Learning via Predictive Samplingcited by 21
  12. 2019Randomized Exploration for Non-Stationary Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 18
  13. 2021Optimistic Policy Optimization is Provably Efficient in Non-stationary MDPscited by 16
  14. 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
  15. 2021Regret Bounds for Generalized Linear Bandits under Parameter Driftcited by 13
  16. 2022Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logistic Function Approximationcited by 13
  17. 2017Distribution-Free One-Pass Learningcited by 10
  18. 2021Learning User Preferences in Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 10
  19. 2024Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logit Function Approximationcited by 10
  20. 2023Linear Bandits with Memory: from Rotting to Risingcited by 6
  21. 2024Near-Optimal Dynamic Regret for Adversarial Linear Mixture MDPscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Revisiting Weighted Strategy for Non-stationary Parametric Bandits
  2. 2026Flow-Corrected Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Contextual Bandits
  3. 2024Is Prior-Free Black-Box Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning Feasible?
  4. 2026From Weighting to Modeling: A Nonparametric Estimator for Off-Policy Evaluation
  5. 2024Towards Principled, Practical Policy Gradient for Bandits and Tabular MDPs
  6. 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity
  7. 2025Non-Stationary Restless Multi-Armed Bandits with Provable Guarantee
  8. 2026Invariance-Based Dynamic Regret Minimization