mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Principled, Practical Policy Gradient for Bandits and Tabular MDPs

arXiv 2405.13136 ↗First posted 21 May 2024cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider (stochastic) softmax policy gradient (PG) methods for bandits and tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs). While the PG objective is non-concave, recent research has used the objective's smoothness and gradient domination properties to achieve convergence to an optimal policy. However, these theoretical results require setting the algorithm parameters according to unknown problem-dependent quantities (e.g. the optimal action or the true reward vector in a bandit problem). To address this issue, we borrow ideas from the optimization literature to design practical, principled PG methods in both the exact and stochastic settings. In the exact setting, we employ an Armijo line-search to set the step-size for softmax PG and demonstrate a linear convergence rate. In the stochastic setting, we utilize exponentially decreasing step-sizes, and characterize the convergence rate of the resulting algorithm. We show that the proposed algorithm offers similar theoretical guarantees as the state-of-the art results, but does not require the knowledge of oracle-like quantities. For the multi-armed bandit setting, our techniques result in a theoretically-principled PG algorithm that does not require explicit exploration, the knowledge of the reward gap, the reward distributions, or the noise. Finally, we empirically compare the proposed methods to PG approaches that require oracle knowledge, and demonstrate competitive performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

Builds on

19 of 43 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 335
  4. 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 171
  5. 2020Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 170
  6. 2022On the Convergence Rates of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 115
  7. 2020Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilitiescited by 108
  8. 2021Dropout Q-Functions for Doubly Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
  9. 2021Reward is enough for convex MDPscited by 82
  10. 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
  11. 2021A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradientcited by 74
  12. 2013Fast Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent under a Strong Growth Conditioncited by 54
7 more
  1. 2020A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and Performancecited by 26
  2. 2021Beyond Exact Gradients: Convergence of Stochastic Soft-Max Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 25
  3. 2023The Role of Baselines in Policy Gradient Optimizationcited by 25
  4. 2021Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy Optimizationcited by 18
  5. 2024Elementary Analysis of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 17
  6. 2021Towards Noise-adaptive, Problem-adaptive (Accelerated) Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 16
  7. 2024Stochastic Gradient Succeeds for Banditscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.