mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Zero-Trust Agentic Federated Learning for Secure IIoT Defense Systems

arXiv 2512.23809 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent attacks on critical infrastructure, including the 2021 Oldsmar water treatment breach and 2023 Danish energy sector compromises, highlight urgent security gaps in Industrial IoT (IIoT) deployments. While Federated Learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative intrusion detection, existing frameworks remain vulnerable to Byzantine poisoning attacks and lack robust agent authentication. We propose Zero-Trust Agentic Federated Learning (ZTA-FL), a defense in depth framework combining: (1) TPM-based cryptographic attestation achieving less than 0.0000001 false acceptance rate, (2) a novel SHAP-weighted aggregation algorithm providing explainable Byzantine detection under non-IID conditions with theoretical guarantees, and (3) privacy-preserving on-device adversarial training. Comprehensive experiments across three IDS benchmarks (Edge-IIoTset, CIC-IDS2017, UNSW-NB15) demonstrate that ZTA-FL achieves 97.8 percent detection accuracy, 93.2 percent accuracy under 30 percent Byzantine attacks (outperforming FLAME by 3.1 percent, p less than 0.01), and 89.3 percent adversarial robustness while reducing communication overhead by 34 percent. We provide theoretical analysis, failure mode characterization, and release code for reproducibility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 35 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  6. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  7. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  8. 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 371
  9. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
  10. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  11. 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 314
  12. 2020Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defensescited by 163
3 more
  1. 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 125
  2. 2024Efficient Federated Intrusion Detection in 5G ecosystem using optimized BERT-based modelcited by 8
  3. 2025Secure Multi-LLM Agentic AI and Agentification for Edge General Intelligence by Zero-Trust: A Surveycited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agentic Trust Coordination for Federated Learning through Adaptive Thresholding and Autonomous Decision Making in Sustainable and Resilient Industrial Networks
  2. 2026Agentic-ZTA: A Multi-Agent Architecture for Autonomous Zero Trust Enforcement
  3. 2026Skillsets on the Chain: A Blockchain-based Zero-Trust Framework for Agentic AI Networking
  4. 2026Semantic Multi-Agent Intrusion Detection for IoT:Zero-Day and Adversarial Threats with Risk-Aware Reasoning
  5. 2026Generative AI and Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
  6. 2024Fake or Compromised? Making Sense of Malicious Clients in Federated Learning
  7. 2025Fortifying the Agentic Web: A Unified Zero-Trust Architecture Against Logic-layer Threats
  8. 2023TrustFed: A Reliable Federated Learning Framework with Malicious-Attack Resistance