mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Multi-Agent Intrusion Detection for IoT:Zero-Day and Adversarial Threats with Risk-Aware Reasoning

arXiv 2606.10323 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has enabled unprecedented automation and connectivity, but it has also substantially increased the attack surface, exposing networks to sophisticated cyber threats, including zero-day and adversarial intrusions. Traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) struggle to generalize to unseen attacks, often require substantial computational resources, and lack interpretability, particularly in resource-constrained and heterogeneous IoT networks. Recent advances, including Deep Learning (DL), open-set detection, and Large Language Model (LLM)-based semantic reasoning, address some of these challenges but typically focus on zero-day and adversarial threats and rarely combine semantic reasoning with multi-agent systems. To overcome these limitations, we propose a semantic multi-agent ID that integrates four specialized agents (e.g., Scout, Mutator, Auditor, and Arbiter) that leverage semantic embeddings and multi-stage probabilistic decision fusion. The Scout induces structured hypotheses from semantic embeddings; the Mutator generates adversarially constrained variants; the Auditor evaluates consistency and filters unreliable outputs; and the Arbiter produces interpretable, risk-aware alerts. Extensive experiments across multiple real-world IoT datasets demonstrate that the proposed system achieves 95.9% overall detection accuracy, reduces false-positive rates to 6.8%, improves zero-day detection to 87.9%, and maintains computational efficiency suitable for edge deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MA-IDS: Multi-Agent RAG Framework for IoT Network Intrusion Detection with an Experience Library7 Apr

Other references · 6

  1. 2024Data-Driven Lipschitz Continuity: A Cost-Effective Approach to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 3
  2. 2025Think Fast: Real-Time IoT Intrusion Reasoning Using IDS and LLMs at the Edge Gatewaycited by 3
  3. 2025Evaluating Machine Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection Systems in IoT: Performance and Energy Consumptioncited by 2
  4. 2025Hybrid LLM-Enhanced Intrusion Detection for Zero-Day Threats in IoT Networkscited by 2
  5. 2023Open Set Dandelion Network for IoT Intrusion Detectioncited by 1
  6. 2026A-THENA: Early Intrusion Detection for IoT with Time-Aware Hybrid Encoding and Network-Specific Augmentationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rethinking On-Device LLM Reasoning: Why Analogical Mapping Outperforms Abstract Thinking for IoT DDoS Detection ↗
  2. 2025An LLM-Powered AI Agent Framework for Holistic IoT Traffic Interpretation
  3. 2026Multi-Agent Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Low-Altitude Economy IoT: An LLM-Enhanced Agentic AI Framework
  4. 2025What's on My Network? Using Large Language Models to Identify Real-World IoT Devices at Scale
  5. 2026ExAI5G: A Logic-Based Explainable AI Framework for Intrusion Detection in 5G Networks
  6. 2025Lightweight Intrusion Detection in IoT via SHAP-Guided Feature Pruning and Knowledge-Distilled Kronecker Networks
  7. 2025LENS-XAI: Redefining Lightweight and Explainable Network Security through Knowledge Distillation and Variational Autoencoders for Scalable Intrusion Detection in Cybersecurity
  8. 2025LLM-based Multi-class Attack Analysis and Mitigation Framework in IoT/IIoT Networks