TrustFed: A Reliable Federated Learning Framework with Malicious-Attack Resistance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a key technology in 6G research, federated learning (FL) enables collaborative learning among multiple clients while ensuring individual data privacy. However, malicious attackers among the participating clients can intentionally tamper with the training data or the trained model, compromising the accuracy and trustworthiness of the system. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose a hierarchical audit-based FL (HiAudit-FL) framework, with the aim to enhance the reliability and security of the learning process. The hierarchical audit process includes two stages, namely model-audit and parameter-audit. In the model-audit stage, a low-overhead audit method is employed to identify suspicious clients. Subsequently, in the parameter-audit stage, a resource-consuming method is used to detect all malicious clients with higher accuracy among the suspicious ones. Specifically, we execute the model audit method among partial clients for multiple rounds, which is modeled as a partial observation Markov decision process (POMDP) with the aim to enhance the robustness and accountability of the decision-making in complex and uncertain environments. Meanwhile, we formulate the problem of identifying malicious attackers through a multi-round audit as an active sequential hypothesis testing problem and leverage a diffusion model-based AI-Enabled audit selection strategy (ASS) to decide which clients should be audited in each round. To accomplish efficient and effective audit selection, we design a DRL-ASS algorithm by incorporating the ASS in a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework. Our simulation results demonstrate that HiAudit-FL can effectively identify and handle potential malicious users accurately, with small system overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
21 of 60 references.
References · 21
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,008
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 247
- 2020Federated Learning for Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challengescited by 138
- 2018Deep Variational Reinforcement Learning for POMDPscited by 122
9 more
- 2020Free-rider Attacks on Model Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 57
- 2020BaFFLe: Backdoor detection via Feedback-based Federated Learningcited by 52
- 2019Free-riders in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defensescited by 48
- 2018Policy Design for Active Sequential Hypothesis Testing using Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2019Deep Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning for Anomaly Detectioncited by 12
- 2021Edge-Native Intelligence for 6G Communications Driven by Federated Learning: A Survey of Trends and Challengescited by 12
- 2019Fixed-horizon Active Hypothesis Testingcited by 4
- 2022Resource Consumption for Supporting Federated Learning in Wireless Networkscited by 3
- 2018Active Anomaly Detection with Switching Costcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Fake or Compromised? Making Sense of Malicious Clients in Federated Learning
- 2024LOGSAFE: Logic-Guided Verification for Trustworthy Federated Time-Series Learning
- 2024Emerging Safety Attack and Defense in Federated Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models
- 2026FedFG: Privacy-Preserving and Robust Federated Learning via Flow-Matching Generation
- 2025Can Federated Learning Safeguard Private Data in LLM Training? Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Defense Evaluation
- 2025Zero-Trust Agentic Federated Learning for Secure IIoT Defense Systems
- 2025A Vision-Language Pre-training Model-Guided Approach for Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0