Less or More: Towards Glanceable Explanations for LLM Recommendations Using Ultra-Small Devices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential in recommending everyday actions as personal AI assistants, while Explainable AI (XAI) techniques are being increasingly utilized to help users understand why a recommendation is given. Personal AI assistants today are often located on ultra-small devices such as smartwatches, which have limited screen space. The verbosity of LLM-generated explanations, however, makes it challenging to deliver glanceable LLM explanations on such ultra-small devices. To address this, we explored 1) spatially structuring an LLM's explanation text using defined contextual components during prompting and 2) presenting temporally adaptive explanations to users based on confidence levels. We conducted a user study to understand how these approaches impacted user experiences when interacting with LLM recommendations and explanations on ultra-small devices. The results showed that structured explanations reduced users' time to action and cognitive load when reading an explanation. Always-on structured explanations increased users' acceptance of AI recommendations. However, users were less satisfied with structured explanations compared to unstructured ones due to their lack of sufficient, readable details. Additionally, adaptively presenting structured explanations was less effective at improving user perceptions of the AI compared to the always-on structured explanations. Together with users' interview feedback, the results led to design implications to be mindful of when personalizing the content and timing of LLM explanations that are displayed on ultra-small devices.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.
Builds on
37 of 82 references.
References · 37
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,530
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
25 more
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2022Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoningcited by 331
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 248
- 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
- 2023AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmapcited by 119
- 2023AnyMAL: An Efficient and Scalable Any-Modality Augmented Language Modelcited by 93
- 2023Neurons in Large Language Models: Dead, N-gram, Positionalcited by 88
- 2020"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humanscited by 86
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2023Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagramscited by 65
- 2014Falling Rule Listscited by 58
- 2021Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Makingcited by 58
- 2022Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Designcited by 47
- 2024LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 38
- 2024"Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 26
- 2023XAIR: A Framework of Explainable AI in Augmented Realitycited by 17
- 2017Simple rules for complex decisionscited by 14
- 2023Beyond Labels: Empowering Human Annotators with Natural Language Explanations through a Novel Active-Learning Architecturecited by 10
- 2022On the Evaluation of the Plausibility and Faithfulness of Sentiment Analysis Explanationscited by 3
- 2023IERL: Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning -- Combining CrowdSourced Knowledge and Distributed Semantic Representationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.