mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive Visualization

arXiv 2311.13057 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2023cs.HCcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for writing has sparked controversy both among readers and writers. On one hand, writers are concerned that LLMs will deprive them of agency and ownership, and readers are concerned about spending their time on text generated by soulless machines. On the other hand, AI-assistance can improve writing as long as writers can conform to publisher policies, and as long as readers can be assured that a text has been verified by a human. We argue that a system that captures the provenance of interaction with an LLM can help writers retain their agency, conform to policies, and communicate their use of AI to publishers and readers transparently. Thus we propose HaLLMark, a tool for visualizing the writer's interaction with the LLM. We evaluated HaLLMark with 13 creative writers, and found that it helped them retain a sense of control and ownership of the text.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 12; 2026: 11.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agentscited by 33
  2. 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
  3. 2025Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Processcited by 14
  4. 2024Collage is the New Writing: Exploring the Fragmentation of Text and User Interfaces in AI Toolscited by 13
  5. 2025LLM Agents for Interactive Workflow Provenance: Reference Architecture and Evaluation Methodologycited by 10
  6. 2025Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systemscited by 7
  7. 2025Constella: Supporting Storywriters' Interconnected Character Creation through LLM-based Multi-Agentscited by 4
  8. 2025RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 4
  9. 2026Narrix: Remixing Narrative Strategies from Examples for Story Writingcited by 4
  10. 2025AI Rivalry as a Craft: How Resisting and Embracing Generative AI Reshape Writing Professionscited by 3
  11. 2025Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answerscited by 3
  12. 2025XAgen: An Explainability Tool for Identifying and Correcting Failures in Multi-Agent Workflowscited by 3
12 more
  1. 2025The AI Memory Gap: Users Misremember What They Created With AI or Withoutcited by 2
  2. 2026Investigating Writing Professionals' Relationships with Generative AI: How Combined Perceptions of Rivalry and Collaboration Shape Work Practices and Outcomescited by 2
  3. 2025AI in the Writing Process: How Purposeful AI Support Fosters Student Writingcited by 1
  4. 2026Who Owns the Text? Design Patterns for Preserving Authorship in AI-Assisted Writingcited by 1
  5. 2026What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?cited by 1
  6. 2026Learning from AVA: Early Lessons from a Curated and Trustworthy Generative AI for Policy and Development Researchcited by 1
  7. 2026Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaborationcited by 0
  8. 2026Human-AI Interaction Traces as Blackout Poetry: Reframing AI-Supported Writing as Found-Text Creativitycited by 0
  9. 2026FocalLens: Visualizing Narratives through Focalizationcited by 0
  10. 2026When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibrationcited by 0
  11. 2026AdaLens: Interactive Storyline for Monitoring and Steering Long-Running Agentic Data Analysiscited by 0
  12. 2026Likelihood Is Not Authorship: Can We Reliably Measure Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Writing?cited by 0