mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning optimal policies from event logs through reinforcement learning: a comparison of deep and MDP-based approaches

arXiv 2303.09209 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2023cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prescriptive Process Monitoring is an emerging area within Process Mining that focuses on recommending actions to optimize business outcomes. Most existing works prescribe pre-defined interventions, i.e., sets of actions applied to ongoing process executions to achieve a specific objective or Key Performance Indicator (KPI). In contrast, only a few approaches have explored learning and evaluating optimal behavioral policies, i.e., general strategies that determine the best sequence of actions to maximize a desired KPI. In this paper, we address the problem of learning optimal behavioral policies by proposing an AI-based approach that learns an optimal policy directly from historical process executions using Reinforcement Learning (RL) to recommend the best actions for optimizing a KPI. To this end, we employ two RL techniques. The first is a classical model-based approach that extends previous work by the authors through the construction of a Markov Decision Process (MDP) capturing process behavior. The second is a model-free technique based on offline Deep RL. Unlike state-of-the-art work, we aim to minimize the use of domain knowledge and learn optimal policies directly from historical event data. This allows us to learn when to apply interventions and discover effective ones directly from data. Moreover, we target complex scenarios involving external actors, where the process owner controls only part of the activities. We adopt a data-driven Business Process Simulation (BPS) environment to evaluate the learned policies. Results show that both methods improve the targeted KPI with similar effectiveness, while the model-based approach outperforms offline Deep RL in computational efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2023.

Builds on

12 of 42 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  2. 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 483
  3. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 288
  4. 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 231
  5. 2018Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?cited by 27
  6. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  7. 2019Fire Now, Fire Later: Alarm-Based Systems for Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 18
  8. 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  9. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
  10. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approachcited by 12
  11. 2019What if Process Predictions are not followed by Good Recommendations? (Technical Report)cited by 3
  12. 2022Learning to act: a Reinforcement Learning approach to recommend the best next activitiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

5 papers.