mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Penalized Fair Regression for Multiple Groups in Chronic Kidney Disease

arXiv 2512.17340 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025stat.ME cs.CY cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fair regression methods have the potential to mitigate societal bias concerns in health care, but there has been little work on penalized fair regression when multiple groups experience such bias. We propose a general regression framework that addresses this gap with unfairness penalties for multiple groups. Our approach is demonstrated for binary outcomes with true positive rate disparity penalties. It can be efficiently implemented through reduction to a cost-sensitive classification problem. We additionally introduce novel score functions for automatically selecting penalty weights. Our penalized fair regression methods are empirically studied in simulations, where they achieve a fairness-accuracy frontier beyond that of existing comparison methods. Finally, we apply these methods to a national multi-site primary care study of chronic kidney disease to develop a fair classifier for end-stage renal disease. There we find substantial improvements in fairness for multiple race and ethnicity groups who experience societal bias in the health care system without any appreciable loss in overall fit.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

20 of 56 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  3. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  4. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  5. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  6. 2020Ethical Machine Learning in Health Carecited by 112
  7. 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 94
  8. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  9. 2020An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 45
  10. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  11. 2022Net benefit, calibration, threshold selection, and training objectives for algorithmic fairness in healthcarecited by 16
  12. 2020Cyberbullying Detection with Fairness Constraintscited by 15
8 more
  1. 2021Achieving Fairness with a Simple Ridge Penaltycited by 13
  2. 2021FADE: FAir Double Ensemble Learning for Observable and Counterfactual Outcomescited by 13
  3. 2019Fair Regression for Health Care Spendingcited by 10
  4. 2017Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learningcited by 8
  5. 2023A Sequentially Fair Mechanism for Multiple Sensitive Attributescited by 8
  6. 2022Practical Approaches for Fair Learning with Multitype and Multivariate Sensitive Attributescited by 3
  7. 2025Enhancing Multi-Attribute Fairness in Healthcare Predictive Modelingcited by 2
  8. 2024Algorithmic Changes Are Not Enough: Evaluating the Removal of Race Adjustment from the eGFR Equationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.