Enhancing Multi-Attribute Fairness in Healthcare Predictive Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare have demonstrated remarkable potential to improve patient outcomes. However, if not designed with fairness in mind, they also carry the risks of perpetuating or exacerbating existing health disparities. Although numerous fairness-enhancing techniques have been proposed, most focus on a single sensitive attribute and neglect the broader impact that optimizing fairness for one attribute may have on the fairness of other sensitive attributes. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to multi-attribute fairness optimization in healthcare AI, tackling fairness concerns across multiple demographic attributes concurrently. Our method follows a two-phase approach: initially optimizing for predictive performance, followed by fine-tuning to achieve fairness across multiple sensitive attributes. We develop our proposed method using two strategies, sequential and simultaneous. Our results show a significant reduction in Equalized Odds Disparity (EOD) for multiple attributes, while maintaining high predictive accuracy. Notably, we demonstrate that single-attribute fairness methods can inadvertently increase disparities in non-targeted attributes whereas simultaneous multi-attribute optimization achieves more balanced fairness improvements across all attributes. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive fairness strategies in healthcare AI and offer promising directions for future research in this critical area.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2025.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2016A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracycited by 73
- 2018Creating Fair Models of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Riskcited by 23
- 2020Addressing Fairness in Classification with a Model-Agnostic Multi-Objective Algorithmcited by 23
5 more
- 2020How fair can we go in machine learning? Assessing the boundaries of fairness in decision treescited by 22
- 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
- 2021FairMask: Better Fairness via Model-based Rebalancing of Protected Attributescited by 19
- 2019Fair Regression for Health Care Spendingcited by 10
- 2024Explainable AI for Fair Sepsis Mortality Predictive Modelcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.