Fair Regression for Health Care Spending
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The distribution of health care payments to insurance plans has substantial consequences for social policy. Risk adjustment formulas predict spending in health insurance markets in order to provide fair benefits and health care coverage for all enrollees, regardless of their health status. Unfortunately, current risk adjustment formulas are known to underpredict spending for specific groups of enrollees leading to undercompensated payments to health insurers. This incentivizes insurers to design their plans such that individuals in undercompensated groups will be less likely to enroll, impacting access to health care for these groups. To improve risk adjustment formulas for undercompensated groups, we expand on concepts from the statistics, computer science, and health economics literature to develop new fair regression methods for continuous outcomes by building fairness considerations directly into the objective function. We additionally propose a novel measure of fairness while asserting that a suite of metrics is necessary in order to evaluate risk adjustment formulas more fully. Our data application using the IBM MarketScan Research Databases and simulation studies demonstrate that these new fair regression methods may lead to massive improvements in group fairness (e.g., 98%) with only small reductions in overall fit (e.g., 4%).
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
- 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regressioncited by 17
- 2022Net benefit, calibration, threshold selection, and training objectives for algorithmic fairness in healthcarecited by 16
- 2021A comparison of approaches to improve worst-case predictive model performance over patient subpopulationscited by 12
- 2025Enhancing Multi-Attribute Fairness in Healthcare Predictive Modelingcited by 2
- 2024Generative AI in Medicinecited by 1
- 2022A Huber loss-based super learner with applications to healthcare expenditurescited by 0
- 2025Liouville PDE-based sliced-Wasserstein flowcited by 0
- 2025Penalized Fair Regression for Multiple Groups in Chronic Kidney Diseasecited by 0
- 2026A Statistical Framework for Data-Driven Discovery of Differential Performance in Clinical Risk Prediction Modelscited by 0
- 2026A Statistical Framework for Data-Driven Discovery of Differential Performance in Clinical Risk Prediction Models2 Aug 2026
- 2025Penalized Fair Regression for Multiple Groups in Chronic Kidney Disease19 Dec 2025
- 2025Liouville PDE-based sliced-Wasserstein flow22 May 2025
- 2025Enhancing Multi-Attribute Fairness in Healthcare Predictive Modeling22 Jan 2025
- 2024Generative AI in Medicine13 Dec 2024
- 2022A Huber loss-based super learner with applications to healthcare expenditures13 May 2022
- 2022Net benefit, calibration, threshold selection, and training objectives for algorithmic fairness in healthcare3 Feb 2022
- 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness27 Sep 2021
- 2021A comparison of approaches to improve worst-case predictive model performance over patient subpopulations27 Aug 2021
- 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regression24 Feb 2021