mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FADE: FAir Double Ensemble Learning for Observable and Counterfactual Outcomes

arXiv 2109.00173 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Methods for building fair predictors often involve tradeoffs between fairness and accuracy and between different fairness criteria, but the nature of these tradeoffs varies. Recent work seeks to characterize these tradeoffs in specific problem settings, but these methods often do not accommodate users who wish to improve the fairness of an existing benchmark model without sacrificing accuracy, or vice versa. These results are also typically restricted to observable accuracy and fairness criteria. We develop a flexible framework for fair ensemble learning that allows users to efficiently explore the fairness-accuracy space or to improve the fairness or accuracy of a benchmark model. Our framework can simultaneously target multiple observable or counterfactual fairness criteria, and it enables users to combine a large number of previously trained and newly trained predictors. We provide theoretical guarantees that our estimators converge at fast rates. We apply our method on both simulated and real data, with respect to both observable and counterfactual accuracy and fairness criteria. We show that, surprisingly, multiple unfairness measures can sometimes be minimized simultaneously with little impact on accuracy, relative to unconstrained predictors or existing benchmark models.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2021.

Builds on

30 of 64 references.

References · 30

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  7. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  8. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  9. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  10. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  11. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  12. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
18 more
  1. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  2. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 194
  3. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 148
  4. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  5. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 144
  6. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
  7. 2021Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labelscited by 65
  8. 2019Counterfactual Risk Assessments, Evaluation, and Fairnesscited by 59
  9. 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
  10. 2017Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Datacited by 50
  11. 2018Learning Optimal Fair Policiescited by 49
  12. 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
  13. 2020Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized Oddscited by 40
  14. 2020Accuracy and Fairness Trade-offs in Machine Learning: A Stochastic Multi-Objective Approachcited by 39
  15. 2018Sharp instruments for classifying compliers and generalizing causal effectscited by 22
  16. 2019Sensitivity analysis via the proportion of unmeasured confoundingcited by 13
  17. 2015Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effectscited by 12
  18. 2019Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action via Counterfactual Predictionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: