mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Best Practices For Empirical Meta-Algorithmic Research: Guidelines from the COSEAL Research Network

arXiv 2512.16491 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Empirical research on meta-algorithmics, such as algorithm selection, configuration, and scheduling, often relies on extensive and thus computationally expensive experiments. With the large degree of freedom we have over our experimental setup and design comes a plethora of possible error sources that threaten the scalability and validity of our scientific insights. Best practices for meta-algorithmic research exist, but they are scattered between different publications and fields, and continue to evolve separately from each other. In this report, we collect good practices for empirical meta-algorithmic research across the subfields of the COSEAL community, encompassing the entire experimental cycle: from formulating research questions and selecting an experimental design, to executing experiments, and ultimately, analyzing and presenting results impartially. It establishes the current state-of-the-art practices within meta-algorithmic research and serves as a guideline to both new researchers and practitioners in meta-algorithmic fields.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.

Builds on

51 of 112 references.

References · 51

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  5. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  6. 2019NAS-Bench-101: Towards Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 340
  7. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  8. 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 234
  9. 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 229
  10. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
  11. 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
  12. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
38 more
  1. 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
  2. 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 135
  3. 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 131
  4. 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
  5. 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
  6. 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
  7. 2014ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Frameworkcited by 88
  8. 2021HPO-B: A Large-Scale Reproducible Benchmark for Black-Box HPO based on OpenMLcited by 75
  9. 2024Datasets for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 69
  10. 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 61
  11. 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
  12. 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
  13. 2019Best Practices for Scientific Research on Neural Architecture Searchcited by 53
  14. 2025Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025cited by 40
  15. 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 37
  16. 2015ASlib: A Benchmark Library for Algorithm Selectioncited by 36
  17. 2022NAS-Bench-Suite: NAS Evaluation is (Now) Surprisingly Easycited by 36
  18. 2020Evaluating the Performance of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 35
  19. 2020Benchmarking in Optimization: Best Practice and Open Issuescited by 35
  20. 2022A Survey of Methods for Automated Algorithm Configurationcited by 29
  21. 2018IOHprofiler: A Benchmarking and Profiling Tool for Iterative Optimization Heuristicscited by 28
  22. 2021DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 28
  23. 2017Pitfalls and Best Practices in Algorithm Configurationcited by 25
  24. 2024Position: Why We Must Rethink Empirical Research in Machine Learningcited by 19
  25. 2024Data Contamination Report from the 2024 CONDA Shared Taskcited by 19
  26. 2022DeepCAVE: An Interactive Analysis Tool for Automated Machine Learningcited by 14
  27. 2023REFORMS: Reporting Standards for Machine Learning Based Sciencecited by 13
  28. 2021Reproducibility in Evolutionary Computationcited by 12
  29. 2023Pre-registration for Predictive Modelingcited by 11
  30. 2018Learning Multiple Defaults for Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 10
  31. 2021OPTION: OPTImization Algorithm Benchmarking ONtologycited by 9
  32. 2022HPO X ELA: Investigating Hyperparameter Optimization Landscapes by Means of Exploratory Landscape Analysiscited by 9
  33. 2025Unreflected Use of Tabular Data Repositories Can Undermine Research Qualitycited by 9
  34. 2022XAutoML: A Visual Analytics Tool for Understanding and Validating Automated Machine Learningcited by 8
  35. 2024Large-scale Benchmarking of Metaphor-based Optimization Heuristicscited by 8
  36. 2025Overtuning in Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 4
  37. 2025The Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Algorithm Selection: What We Are Getting Wrongcited by 3
  38. 2025carps: A Framework for Comparing N Hyperparameter Optimizers on M Benchmarkscited by 3

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.