Learning Multiple Defaults for Machine Learning Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of modern machine learning methods highly depends on their hyperparameter configurations. One simple way of selecting a configuration is to use default settings, often proposed along with the publication and implementation of a new algorithm. Those default values are usually chosen in an ad-hoc manner to work good enough on a wide variety of datasets. To address this problem, different automatic hyperparameter configuration algorithms have been proposed, which select an optimal configuration per dataset. This principled approach usually improves performance but adds additional algorithmic complexity and computational costs to the training procedure. As an alternative to this, we propose learning a set of complementary default values from a large database of prior empirical results. Selecting an appropriate configuration on a new dataset then requires only a simple, efficient and embarrassingly parallel search over this set. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the approach we propose in comparison to random search and Bayesian Optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 61
- 2022Multi-Objective Model Selection for Time Series Forecastingcited by 8
- 2021Meta-Learning for Symbolic Hyperparameter Defaultscited by 4
- 2025The Role of Hyperparameters in Predictive Multiplicitycited by 4
- 2025Auto-nnU-Net: Towards Automated Medical Image Segmentationcited by 3
- 2022Consolidated learning -- a domain-specific model-free optimization strategy with examples for XGBoost and MIMIC-IVcited by 2
- 2024Finding One's Bearings in the Hyperparameter Landscape of a Wide-Kernel Convolutional Fault Detectorcited by 0
- 2025Best Practices For Empirical Meta-Algorithmic Research: Guidelines from the COSEAL Research Networkcited by 0
- 2026Have I Solved This Before? Retrieving Similar Segmentation Problems for Evolutionary Learningcited by 0
- 2026Have I Solved This Before? Retrieving Similar Segmentation Problems for Evolutionary Learning6 Jun 2026
- 2025Best Practices For Empirical Meta-Algorithmic Research: Guidelines from the COSEAL Research Network18 Dec 2025
- 2025Auto-nnU-Net: Towards Automated Medical Image Segmentation22 May 2025
- 2025The Role of Hyperparameters in Predictive Multiplicity13 Mar 2025
- 2024Finding One's Bearings in the Hyperparameter Landscape of a Wide-Kernel Convolutional Fault Detector19 Nov 2024
- 2022Multi-Objective Model Selection for Time Series Forecasting17 Feb 2022
- 2022Consolidated learning -- a domain-specific model-free optimization strategy with examples for XGBoost and MIMIC-IV27 Jan 2022
- 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimization8 Sep 2021
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challenges13 Jul 2021
- 2021Meta-Learning for Symbolic Hyperparameter Defaults10 Jun 2021