mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BashArena: A Control Setting for Highly Privileged AI Agents

arXiv 2512.15688 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 17

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Future AI agents might run autonomously with elevated privileges. If these agents are misaligned, they might abuse these privileges to cause serious damage. The field of AI control develops techniques that make it harder for misaligned AIs to cause such damage, while preserving their usefulness. We introduce BashArena, a setting for studying AI control techniques in security-critical environments. BashArena contains 637 Linux system administration and infrastructure engineering tasks in complex, realistic environments, along with four sabotage objectives (execute malware, exfiltrate secrets, escalate privileges, and disable firewall) for a red team to target. We evaluate multiple frontier LLMs on their ability to complete tasks, perform sabotage undetected, and detect sabotage attempts. Claude Sonnet 4.5 successfully executes sabotage while evading monitoring by GPT-4.1 mini 26% of the time, at 4% trajectory-wise FPR. Our findings provide a baseline for designing more effective control protocols in BashArena. We release the dataset as a ControlArena setting and share our task generation pipeline.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

1 of 26 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 72

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 17.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents
  2. 2026SeClaw: Spec-Driven Security Task Synthesis for Evaluating Autonomous Agents
  3. 2025How to evaluate control measures for LLM agents? A trajectory from today to superintelligence
  4. 2026Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems
  5. 2025Progent: Securing AI Agents with Privilege Control
  6. 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
  7. 2025Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agents
  8. 2026One Goal, Many Commands: Characterizing Denylist Fragility in AI Agents