mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learning

arXiv 2605.26341 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates mechanistic knowledge, typically through partial differential equations (PDEs), into data-driven models. Despite strong empirical performance, its statistical generalisation properties remain poorly understood, especially for regression with unbounded losses. We develop a PAC-Bayesian framework for PIML that provides high-probability generalisation guarantees under potentially unbounded losses. Exploiting the structure of physics-informed objectives, we derive component-wise bounds whose complexity scales with the input-gradient energy of each loss, establishing a direct link between physical regularity and generalisation. We further introduce a PAC-Bayesian calibration procedure that yields computable gradient-based complexities while controlling rare large-gradient events through a residual-tail correction. Adopting a multi-task view of data fidelity, PDE residuals, initial conditions, and boundary conditions, we obtain a refined certificate with a single PAC-Bayesian complexity penalty, avoiding the looseness of independently bounding each component. Building on this certificate, we propose a bound-aware learning procedure that promotes empirical accuracy, proximity to a physics-informed prior, and low input-gradient complexity. Experiments on six PDE benchmarks yield substantially tighter certificates than bounded-loss and sub-Gaussian alternatives, while ablations quantify the effects of posterior-training data, calibration data, gradient envelopes, and hypothesis localisation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 44 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  3. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  4. 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
  5. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 231
  6. 2019A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learningcited by 130
  7. 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
  8. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
  9. 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
  10. 2022Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningcited by 65
  11. 2023Generalization Bounds: Perspectives from Information Theory and PAC-Bayescited by 60
  12. 2016Simpler PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Hostile Datacited by 45
16 more
  1. 2020PAC-Bayes unleashed: generalisation bounds with unbounded lossescited by 43
  2. 2021Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimalitycited by 40
  3. 2022PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Heavy-Tailed Losses through Supermartingalescited by 23
  4. 2023More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validitycited by 17
  5. 2019PAC-Bayes under potentially heavy tailscited by 16
  6. 2024A PAC-Bayesian Link Between Generalisation and Flat Minimacited by 13
  7. 2019Improved PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Linear Regressioncited by 12
  8. 2023Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Boundscited by 11
  9. 2024Physics-informed machine learning as a kernel methodcited by 11
  10. 2024Physics-informed kernel learningcited by 11
  11. 2024More Flexible PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning by Learning Learning Algorithmscited by 10
  12. 2024PAC-Bayes-Chernoff bounds for unbounded lossescited by 9
  13. 2022On the Importance of Gradient Norm in PAC-Bayesian Boundscited by 6
  14. 2025PAC-Bayes Bounds for Multivariate Linear Regression and Linear Autoencoderscited by 3
  15. 2025Fast Rate Bounds for Multi-Task and Meta-Learning with Different Sample Sizescited by 2
  16. 2025Physics-informed learning under mixing: How physical knowledge speeds up learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.