Becoming Experienced Judges: Selective Test-Time Learning for Evaluators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic evaluation with large language models, commonly known as LLM-as-a-judge, is now standard across reasoning and alignment tasks. Despite evaluating many samples in deployment, these evaluators typically (i) treat each case independently, missing the opportunity to accumulate experience, and (ii) rely on a single fixed prompt for all cases, neglecting the need for sample-specific evaluation criteria. We introduce Learning While Evaluating (LWE), a framework that allows evaluators to improve sequentially at inference time without requiring training or validation sets. LWE maintains an evolving meta-prompt that (i) produces sample-specific evaluation instructions and (ii) refines itself through self-generated feedback. Furthermore, we propose Selective LWE, which updates the meta-prompt only on self-inconsistent cases, focusing computation where it matters most. This selective approach retains the benefits of sequential learning while being far more cost-effective. Across two pairwise comparison benchmarks, Selective LWE outperforms strong baselines, empirically demonstrating that evaluators can improve during sequential testing with a simple selective update, learning most from the cases they struggle with.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 362
- 2024Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 249
- 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 236
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 226
14 more
- 2024Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluationcited by 123
- 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 99
- 2024VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Modelscited by 85
- 2025Learning to Plan & Reason for Evaluation with Thinking-LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 75
- 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluationcited by 72
- 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Modelscited by 69
- 2025One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 56
- 2025Contextual Experience Replay for Self-Improvement of Language Agentscited by 46
- 2025Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interactioncited by 34
- 2025MCTS-Judge: Test-Time Scaling in LLM-as-a-Judge for Code Correctness Evaluationcited by 32
- 2025Leveraging LLMs as Meta-Judges: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating LLM Judgmentscited by 16
- 2025R2D2: Remembering, Replaying and Dynamic Decision Making with a Reflective Agentic Memorycited by 14
- 2025Toward Evaluative Thinking: Meta Policy Optimization with Evolving Reward Modelscited by 4
- 2025Log-Augmented Generation: Scaling Test-Time Reasoning with Reusable Computationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.