MASRubric: Auditing Information Flow in Multi-Agent Systems with Failure-Distilled Pitfall Rubrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While multi-agent systems (MAS) excel at complex reasoning, they are vulnerable to errors that intermediate agents introduce and downstream agents build upon. Auditing intermediate messages before they propagate requires an explicit standard, yet evaluation rubrics are typically authored by domain experts or written against a reference answer, neither of which is available for an unseen message at test time. We present MASRubric, a MAS information flow auditing framework with failure-distilled pitfall rubrics. Offline, trajectories on which the MAS has failed are automatically distilled into a reusable bank of pitfall criteria, each describing a recurrent error by its underlying misconception, the reasoning situations in which it arises, and the check that would expose it. Online, the criteria applicable to each intermediate message are retrieved from this off-the-shelf bank and checked one by one, and the resulting satisfaction rate decides whether the message is broadcast, returned to its author with diagnostic feedback for revision, or withheld. Empirical results demonstrate that MASRubric enhances MAS performance on both fixed and dynamic frameworks, achieving average accuracy gains of up to 2.83 points on math reasoning benchmarks and 1.74 points on code generation benchmarks. Further analysis shows that the retrieved criteria vary systematically with task types, and that the audit effort tracks task difficulty. Moreover, the bank transfers without re-mining to a system with a stronger backbone, which makes more adaptive and more efficient use of it. Our code and dataset are released at https://github.com/TonySY2/MASRubric.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
36 of 49 references.
References · 36
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
24 more
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 395
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representationscited by 203
- 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 170
- 2024Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?cited by 153
- 2025ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoningcited by 144
- 2024Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 129
- 2025KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Codingcited by 115
- 2024GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoningcited by 113
- 2024G-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural Networkscited by 110
- 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?cited by 105
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestrationcited by 102
- 2025AGrail: A Lifelong Agent Guardrail with Effective and Adaptive Safety Detectioncited by 82
- 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 65
- 2025G-Safeguard: A Topology-Guided Security Lens and Treatment on LLM-based Multi-agent Systemscited by 56
- 2025EvoFlow: Evolving Diverse Agentic Workflows On The Flycited by 49
- 2024GraphReader: Building Graph-based Agent to Enhance Long-Context Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2025GUARDIAN: Safeguarding LLM Multi-Agent Collaborations with Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 35
- 2025Auto-Rubric: Learning From Implicit Weights to Explicit Rubrics for Reward Modelingcited by 29
- 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 23
- 2026Agentic Rubrics as Contextual Verifiers for SWE Agentscited by 22
- 2025AgentInit: Initializing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems via Diversity and Expertise Orchestration for Effective and Efficient Collaborationcited by 10
- 2026Orchestrating Intelligence: Confidence-Aware Routing for Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration across Multi-Scale Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AgentAsk: Multi-Agent Systems Need to Ask
- 2026ExComm: Exploration-Stage Communication for Error-Resilient Agentic Test-Time Scaling
- 2025CORRECT: COndensed eRror RECognition via knowledge Transfer in multi-agent systems
- 2025Stop Wasting Your Tokens: Towards Efficient Runtime Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026DIANOIA: Diagnostic Decomposition and Joint Optimization for Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents
- 2026Rethinking the Evaluation of Efficiency Methods for Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Preventing Error Propagation in Multi-Agent AI through Runtime Monitoring