Samplability makes learning easier
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The standard definition of PAC learning (Valiant 1984) requires learners to succeed under all distributions -- even ones that are intractable to sample from. This stands in contrast to samplable PAC learning (Blum, Furst, Kearns, and Lipton 1993), where learners only have to succeed under samplable distributions. We study this distinction and show that samplable PAC substantially expands the power of efficient learners. We first construct a concept class that requires exponential sample complexity in standard PAC but is learnable with polynomial sample complexity in samplable PAC. We then lift this statistical separation to the computational setting and obtain a separation relative to a random oracle. Our proofs center around a new complexity primitive, explicit evasive sets, that we introduce and study. These are sets for which membership is easy to determine but are extremely hard to sample from. Our results extend to the online setting to similarly show how its landscape changes when the adversary is assumed to be efficient instead of computationally unbounded.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.
Builds on
8 of 33 references.
References · 8
- 2022On characterizations of learnability with computable learnerscited by 16
- 2023On Computable Online Learningcited by 12
- 2023Find a witness or shatter: the landscape of computable PAC learningcited by 10
- 2023Lifting uniform learners via distributional decompositioncited by 8
- 2023Distributional PAC-Learning from Nisan's Natural Proofscited by 4
- 2024Effective Littlestone Dimensioncited by 3
- 2025A Distributional-Lifting Theorem for PAC Learningcited by 3
- 2021Learning with distributional inverterscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.