mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Distributional-Lifting Theorem for PAC Learning

arXiv 2506.16651 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.CC cs.DScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The apparent difficulty of efficient distribution-free PAC learning has led to a large body of work on distribution-specific learning. Distributional assumptions facilitate the design of efficient algorithms but also limit their reach and relevance. Towards addressing this, we prove a distributional-lifting theorem: This upgrades a learner that succeeds with respect to a limited distribution family D to one that succeeds with respect to any distribution D^star, with an efficiency overhead that scales with the complexity of expressing D^star as a mixture of distributions in D. Recent work of Blanc, Lange, Malik, and Tan considered the special case of lifting uniform-distribution learners and designed a lifter that uses a conditional sample oracle for D^star, a strong form of access not afforded by the standard PAC model. Their approach, which draws on ideas from semi-supervised learning, first learns D^star and then uses this information to lift. We show that their approach is information-theoretically intractable with access only to random examples, thereby giving formal justification for their use of the conditional sample oracle. We then take a different approach that sidesteps the need to learn D^star, yielding a lifter that works in the standard PAC model and enjoys additional advantages: it works for all base distribution families, preserves the noise tolerance of learners, has better sample complexity, and is simpler.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.

Builds on

10 of 56 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022Reproducibility in Learningcited by 44
  2. 2021Realizable Learning is All You Needcited by 25
  3. 2018Beyond the Low-Degree Algorithm: Mixtures of Subcubes and Their Applicationscited by 15
  4. 2019When can unlabeled data improve the learning rate?cited by 14
  5. 2019Random Restrictions of High-Dimensional Distributions and Uniformity Testing with Subcube Conditioningcited by 14
  6. 2020Learning and Testing Junta Distributions with Subcube Conditioningcited by 13
  7. 2024Adaptive and oblivious statistical adversaries are equivalentcited by 9
  8. 2023Lifting uniform learners via distributional decompositioncited by 8
  9. 2024On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learningcited by 7
  10. 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.