mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Computable Online Learning

arXiv 2302.04357 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We initiate a study of computable online (c-online) learning, which we analyze under varying requirements for "optimality" in terms of the mistake bound. Our main contribution is to give a necessary and sufficient condition for optimal c-online learning and show that the Littlestone dimension no longer characterizes the optimal mistake bound of c-online learning. Furthermore, we introduce anytime optimal (a-optimal) online learning, a more natural conceptualization of "optimality" and a generalization of Littlestone's Standard Optimal Algorithm. We show the existence of a computational separation between a-optimal and optimal online learning, proving that a-optimal online learning is computationally more difficult. Finally, we consider online learning with no requirements for optimality, and show, under a weaker notion of computability, that the finiteness of the Littlestone dimension no longer characterizes whether a class is c-online learnable with finite mistake bound. A potential avenue for strengthening this result is suggested by exploring the relationship between c-online and CPAC learning, where we show that c-online learning is as difficult as improper CPAC learning.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

Builds on

3 of 15 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Online Learning with Simple Predictors and a Combinatorial Characterization of Minimax in 0/1 Gamescited by 18
  2. 2022On characterizations of learnability with computable learnerscited by 16
  3. 2019Bounds in Query Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

12 papers.