mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Find a witness or shatter: the landscape of computable PAC learning

arXiv 2302.04731 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2023cs.CC cs.LG math.LOcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper contributes to the study of CPAC learnability -- a computable version of PAC learning -- by solving three open questions from recent papers. Firstly, we prove that every improperly CPAC learnable class is contained in a class which is properly CPAC learnable with polynomial sample complexity. This confirms a conjecture by Agarwal et al (COLT 2021). Secondly, we show that there exists a decidable class of hypothesis which is properly CPAC learnable, but only with uncomputably fast growing sample complexity. This solves a question from Sterkenburg (COLT 2022). Finally, we construct a decidable class of finite Littlestone dimension which is not improperly CPAC learnable, strengthening a recent result of Sterkenburg (2022) and answering a question posed by Hasrati and Ben-David (ALT 2023). Together with previous work, our results provide a complete landscape for the learnability problem in the CPAC setting.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.

Builds on

1 of 11 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022On characterizations of learnability with computable learnerscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.