Lifting uniform learners via distributional decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show how any PAC learning algorithm that works under the uniform distribution can be transformed, in a blackbox fashion, into one that works under an arbitrary and unknown distribution D. The efficiency of our transformation scales with the inherent complexity of D, running in poly(n, (md)d) time for distributions over ± 1n whose pmfs are computed by depth-d decision trees, where m is the sample complexity of the original algorithm. For monotone distributions our transformation uses only samples from D, and for general ones it uses subcube conditioning samples. A key technical ingredient is an algorithm which, given the aforementioned access to D, produces an optimal decision tree decomposition of D: an approximation of D as a mixture of uniform distributions over disjoint subcubes. With this decomposition in hand, we run the uniform-distribution learner on each subcube and combine the hypotheses using the decision tree. This algorithmic decomposition lemma also yields new algorithms for learning decision tree distributions with runtimes that exponentially improve on the prior state of the art -- results of independent interest in distribution learning.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.
Builds on
14 of 58 references.
References · 14
- 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
- 2014Testing probability distributions underlying aggregated datacited by 15
- 2018Beyond the Low-Degree Algorithm: Mixtures of Subcubes and Their Applicationscited by 15
- 2019When can unlabeled data improve the learning rate?cited by 14
- 2019Random Restrictions of High-Dimensional Distributions and Uniformity Testing with Subcube Conditioningcited by 13
- 2020Learning and Testing Junta Distributions with Subcube Conditioningcited by 13
- 2015Faster Algorithms for Testing under Conditional Samplingcited by 7
- 2014A Chasm Between Identity and Equivalence Testing with Conditional Queriescited by 5
- 2016Tolerant Junta Testing and the Connection to Submodular Optimization and Function Isomorphismcited by 3
- 2016Faster Sublinear Algorithms using Conditional Samplingcited by 3
- 2020Monotone probability distributions over the Boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samplescited by 3
- 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learningcited by 7
- 2025A Distributional-Lifting Theorem for PAC Learningcited by 3
- 2025MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Textcited by 3
- 2025Monotonicity Testing of High-Dimensional Distributions with Subcube Conditioningcited by 2
- 2025Learning DNF through Generalized Fourier Representationscited by 0
- 2025Samplability makes learning easiercited by 0
- 2026On Computing Total Variation Distance Between Mixtures of Product Distributionscited by 0
- 2026Testing Distributions Against Bounded Distinguisherscited by 0
- 2026Testing Distributions Against Bounded Distinguishers17 Jul 2026
- 2026On Computing Total Variation Distance Between Mixtures of Product Distributions5 May 2026
- 2025Samplability makes learning easier1 Dec 2025
- 2025MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Text13 Aug 2025
- 2025A Distributional-Lifting Theorem for PAC Learning19 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning DNF through Generalized Fourier Representations1 Jun 2025
- 2025Monotonicity Testing of High-Dimensional Distributions with Subcube Conditioning22 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learning24 May 2024