Pore-scale Image Patch Dataset and A Comparative Evaluation of Pore-scale Facial Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The weak-texture nature of facial skin regions presents significant challenges for local descriptor matching in applications such as facial motion analysis and 3D face reconstruction. Although deep learning-based descriptors have demonstrated superior performance to traditional hand-crafted descriptors in many applications, the scarcity of pore-scale image patch datasets has hindered their further development in the facial domain. In this paper, we propose the PorePatch dataset, a high-quality pore-scale image patch dataset, and establish a rational evaluation benchmark. We introduce a Data-Model Co-Evolution (DMCE) framework to generate a progressively refined, high-quality dataset from high-resolution facial images. We then train existing SOTA models on our dataset and conduct extensive experiments. Our results show that the SOTA model achieves a FPR95 value of 1.91% on the matching task, outperforming PSIFT (22.41%) by a margin of 20.5%. However, its advantage is diminished in the 3D reconstruction task, where its overall performance is not significantly better than that of traditional descriptors. This indicates that deep learning descriptors still have limitations in addressing the challenges of facial weak-texture regions, and much work remains to be done in this field.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2025.
Builds on
10 of 31 references.
References · 10
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 261
- 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
- 2023NeRSemble: Multi-view Radiance Field Reconstruction of Human Headscited by 190
- 2019SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learningcited by 131
- 2020A Decade Survey of Content Based Image Retrieval using Deep Learningcited by 72
- 2024Local Feature Matching Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 26
- 2014Descriptor Matching with Convolutional Neural Networks: a Comparison to SIFTcited by 8
- 2021SDGMNet: Statistic-based Dynamic Gradient Modulation for Local Descriptor Learningcited by 5
- 2019Robust Angular Local Descriptor Learningcited by 2
- 2018A Large Dataset for Improving Patch Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.