GEM: Generative Entropy-Guided Preference Modeling for Few-shot Alignment of LLMs
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences typically relies on supervised reward models or external judges that demand abundant annotations. However, in fields that rely on professional knowledge, such as medicine and law, such large-scale preference labels are often unachievable. In this paper, we propose a generative entropy-guided preference modeling approach named GEM for LLMs aligment at low-resource and domain-specific scenarios. Instead of training a discriminative reward model on preference data, we directly train the LLM to internalize a closed-loop optimization architecture that can extract and exploit the multi-dimensional, fine-grained cognitive signals implicit in human preferences. Specifically, our Cognitive Filtering module, based on entropy theory in decision making, first leverages Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to generate diverse candidate reasoning chains (CoTs) from preference data. Subsequently, it introduces a token scoring mechanism to rank and weight the sampled CoTs, boosting the importance of high-confidence answers and strategically high-entropy tokens. Building on these filtered preferences, we fine-tune the LLM using a novel self-evaluated group advantage algorithm, SEGA, which effectively aggregates group-level cognitive signals and transforms the entropy-based scores into implicit rewards for policy optimization. In these ways, GEM empowers the LLM to rely on its own judgments and establishes an entropy-guided closed-loop cognitive optimization framework, enabling highly efficient few-shot alignment of LLMs. Experiments on general benchmarks and domain-specific tasks (such as mathematical reasoning and medical dialogues) demonstrate that our GEM achieves significant improvements with few-shot preference data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 49 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2025.
Builds on
49 of 81 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier22 Feb
- 2024Preference Optimization with Multi-Sample Comparisons16 Oct
- 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun
- 2023Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback23 May
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision4 May
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 43
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
31 more
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 540
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
- 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 202
- 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 160
- 2025MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare Copilotcited by 83
- 2024Enhancing Code LLMs with Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation: A Surveycited by 82
- 2024Confidence Regulation Neurons in Language Modelscited by 57
- 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Promptingcited by 52
- 2025ReAgent-V: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Video Understandingcited by 50
- 2024Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Chain-of-Thought Distillationcited by 23
- 2022Ranking Inferences Based on the Top Choice of Multiway Comparisonscited by 22
- 2024Open Source Language Models Can Provide Feedback: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Help Students Using GPT-4-As-A-Judgecited by 19
- 2020Brain-inspired Search Engine Assistant based on Knowledge Graphcited by 13
- 2025Entropy-guided sequence weighting for efficient exploration in RL-based LLM fine-tuningcited by 13
- 2021Interpretable Visual Understanding with Cognitive Attention Networkcited by 12
- 2025Twin Co-Adaptive Dialogue for Progressive Image Generationcited by 11
- 2024Alignment Studio: Aligning Large Language Models to Particular Contextual Regulationscited by 10
- 2024Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Trainingcited by 10
- 2025Latent Preference Coding: Aligning Large Language Models via Discrete Latent Codescited by 7
- 2025EHRStruct: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models on Structured Electronic Health Record Taskscited by 5
- 2025A Smart Multimodal Healthcare Copilot with Powerful LLM Reasoningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Leveraging Robust Optimization for LLM Alignment under Distribution Shifts
- 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
- 2025PITA: Preference-Guided Inference-Time Alignment for LLM Post-Training
- 2026When Weak LLMs Speak with Confidence, Preference Alignment Gets Stronger
- 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs
- 2024Disentangling Preference Representation and Text Generation for Efficient Individual Preference Alignment
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2025Stackelberg Self-Annotation: A Robust Approach to Data-Efficient LLM Alignment