mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Verifying LLM Inference to Detect Model Weight Exfiltration

arXiv 2511.02620 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large AI models become increasingly valuable assets, the risk of model weight exfiltration from inference servers grows accordingly. An attacker controlling an inference server may exfiltrate model weights by hiding them within ordinary model responses, a strategy known as steganography. This work investigates how to verify LLM model inference to defend against such attacks and, more broadly, to detect anomalous or buggy behavior during inference. We formalize model weight exfiltration as a security game, propose a verification framework that can provably mitigate steganographic exfiltration, and specify the trust assumptions associated with our scheme. To enable verification, we characterize valid sources of non-determinism in large language model inference and introduce two practical estimators for them. We evaluate our detection framework on several open-weight models ranging from 3B to 30B parameters. On MOE-Qwen-30B, our detector reduces exfiltratable information to <0.5% with false-positive rate of <0.01%, corresponding to a >200x slowdown for adversaries. Overall, this work further establishes a foundation for defending against model weight exfiltration and demonstrates that strong protection can be achieved with minimal additional cost to inference providers. Our code is made public at: https://github.com/RoyRin/inference_verification_for_model_weight_exfiltration .

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

Builds on

17 of 44 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  2. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
  3. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 975
  4. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  5. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
  6. 2025EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Testcited by 318
  7. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  8. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
  9. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Modelscited by 69
  10. 2024Learning Harmonized Representations for Speculative Samplingcited by 69
  11. 2022Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Modelscited by 55
  12. 2024Model Equality Testing: Which Model Is This API Serving?cited by 44
5 more
  1. 2024Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codescited by 40
  2. 2024Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Userscited by 16
  3. 2025TOPLOC: A Locality Sensitive Hashing Scheme for Trustless Verifiable Inferencecited by 16
  4. 2025Auditing Black-Box LLM APIs with a Rank-Based Uniformity Testcited by 16
  5. 2024Edit Distance Robust Watermarks via Indexing Pseudorandom Codescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Steganographic Potentials of Language Models
  2. 2026Exposing the Systematic Vulnerability of Open-Weight Models to Prefill Attacks
  3. 2025Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
  4. 2026SpecGuard: Inference-Time Backdoor Detection For Free
  5. 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring
  6. 2026Good-Enough LLM Obfuscation (GELO)
  7. 2025Steering the CensorShip: Uncovering Representation Vectors for LLM "Thought" Control
  8. 2026NEST: Nascent Encoded Steganographic Thoughts