mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Edit Distance Robust Watermarks via Indexing Pseudorandom Codes

arXiv 2406.02633 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by the problem of detecting AI-generated text, we consider the problem of watermarking the output of language models with provable guarantees. We aim for watermarks which satisfy: (a) undetectability, a cryptographic notion introduced by Christ, Gunn & Zamir (2024) which stipulates that it is computationally hard to distinguish watermarked language model outputs from the model's actual output distribution; and (b) robustness to channels which introduce a constant fraction of adversarial insertions, substitutions, and deletions to the watermarked text. Earlier schemes could only handle stochastic substitutions and deletions, and thus we are aiming for a more natural and appealing robustness guarantee that holds with respect to edit distance. Our main result is a watermarking scheme which achieves both undetectability and robustness to edits when the alphabet size for the language model is allowed to grow as a polynomial in the security parameter. To derive such a scheme, we follow an approach introduced by Christ & Gunn (2024), which proceeds via first constructing pseudorandom codes satisfying undetectability and robustness properties analogous to those above; our key idea is to handle adversarial insertions and deletions by interpreting the symbols as indices into the codeword, which we call indexing pseudorandom codes. Additionally, our codes rely on weaker computational assumptions than used in previous work. Then we show that there is a generic transformation from such codes over large alphabets to watermarking schemes for arbitrary language models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  2. 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,376
  3. 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,287
  4. 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,005
  5. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  6. 2021Vector-quantized Image Modeling with Improved VQGANcited by 656
  7. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
  8. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 259
  9. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
  10. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  11. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 100
  12. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 97
11 more
  1. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Modelscited by 77
  2. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 72
  3. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Modelscited by 69
  4. 2024Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 60
  5. 2024Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codescited by 40
  6. 2024Excuse me, sir? Your language model is leaking (information)cited by 11
  7. 2014Deletion codes in the high-noise and high-rate regimescited by 2
  8. 2020Edit Distance in Near-Linear Time: it's a Constant Factorcited by 2
  9. 2021Synchronization Strings and Codes for Insertions and Deletions -- a Surveycited by 2
  10. 2016Efficiently decodable insertion/deletion codes for high-noise and high-rate regimescited by 1
  11. 2017Synchronization Strings: Codes for Insertions and Deletions Approaching the Singleton Boundcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

12 papers.