mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aggressive Compression Enables LLM Weight Theft

arXiv 2601.01296 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

As frontier AIs become more powerful and costly to develop, adversaries have increasing incentives to steal model weights by mounting exfiltration attacks. In this work, we consider exfiltration attacks where an adversary attempts to sneak model weights out of a datacenter over a network. While exfiltration attacks are multi-step cyber attacks, we demonstrate that a single factor, the compressibility of model weights, significantly heightens exfiltration risk for large language models (LLMs). We tailor compression specifically for exfiltration by relaxing decompression constraints and demonstrate that attackers could achieve 16x to 100x compression with minimal trade-offs, reducing the time it would take for an attacker to illicitly transmit model weights from the defender's server from months to days. Finally, we study defenses designed to reduce exfiltration risk in three distinct ways: making models harder to compress, making them harder to 'find,' and tracking provenance for post-attack analysis using forensic watermarks. While all defenses are promising, the forensic watermark defense is both effective and cheap, and therefore is a particularly attractive lever for mitigating weight-exfiltration risk.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 41 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  4. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  6. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  7. 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 446
  8. 2024QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebookscited by 354
  9. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
  10. 2023A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Modelscited by 263
  11. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
  12. 2024Extreme Compression of Large Language Models via Additive Quantizationcited by 223
10 more
  1. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
  2. 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 178
  3. 2022Distilling Reasoning Capabilities into Smaller Language Modelscited by 155
  4. 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 152
  5. 2024PV-Tuning: Beyond Straight-Through Estimation for Extreme LLM Compressioncited by 59
  6. 2024EasyQuant: An Efficient Data-free Quantization Algorithm for LLMscited by 17
  7. 2025Verifying LLM Inference to Detect Model Weight Exfiltrationcited by 6
  8. 2019A Survey of Moving Target Defenses for Network Securitycited by 5
  9. 2022TATTOOED: A Robust Deep Neural Network Watermarking Scheme based on Spread-Spectrum Channel Codingcited by 3
  10. 2024Distilling Algorithmic Reasoning from LLMs via Explaining Solution Programscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.