Detecting Generated Images by Fitting Natural Image Distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing realism of generated images has raised significant concerns about their potential misuse, necessitating robust detection methods. Current approaches mainly rely on training binary classifiers, which depend heavily on the quantity and quality of available generated images. In this work, we propose a novel framework that exploits geometric differences between the data manifolds of natural and generated images. To exploit this difference, we employ a pair of functions engineered to yield consistent outputs for natural images but divergent outputs for generated ones, leveraging the property that their gradients reside in mutually orthogonal subspaces. This design enables a simple yet effective detection method: an image is identified as generated if a transformation along its data manifold induces a significant change in the loss value of a self-supervised model pre-trained on natural images. Further more, to address diminishing manifold disparities in advanced generative models, we leverage normalizing flows to amplify detectable differences by extruding generated images away from the natural image manifold. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of this method. Code is available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/ConV.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
36 of 50 references.
References · 36
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
24 more
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2023Align your Latents: High-Resolution Video Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 1,465
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
- 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 960
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2023Text2Video-Zero: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Video Generatorscited by 666
- 2024Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for Allcited by 637
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 332
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 278
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 199
- 2023Forgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 180
- 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 123
- 2023Rotation-Invariant Transformer for Point Cloud Matchingcited by 68
- 2022Detecting GAN-generated Images by Orthogonal Training of Multiple CNNscited by 46
- 2023GenDet: Towards Good Generalizations for AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 36
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Na"ive Exposure of Generative AI Capabilities Undermines Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Towards Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Real Distribution Bias Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Micro-Defects Expose Macro-Fakes: Detecting AI-Generated Images via Local Distributional Shiftscited by 0
- 2026Generated Images Are Easier to Forget: A Machine Unlearning Perspective for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Forensic Twins: Self-Supervised Residual Learning for AI-Generated Image Forensicscited by 0
- 2026Forensic Twins: Self-Supervised Residual Learning for AI-Generated Image Forensics25 Sep 2026
- 2026Generated Images Are Easier to Forget: A Machine Unlearning Perspective for Synthetic Image Detection1 Aug 2026
- 2026Micro-Defects Expose Macro-Fakes: Detecting AI-Generated Images via Local Distributional Shifts10 May 2026
- 2026Towards Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Real Distribution Bias Correction14 Mar 2026
- 2026Na"ive Exposure of Generative AI Capabilities Undermines Deepfake Detection11 Mar 2026