Success and Cost Elicit Convention Formation for Efficient Communication
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans leverage shared conversational context to become increasingly successful and efficient at communicating over time. One manifestation of this is the formation of ad hoc linguistic conventions, which allow people to coordinate on short, less costly utterances that are understood using shared conversational context. We present a method to train large multimodal models to form conventions, enabling efficient communication. Our approach uses simulated reference games between models, and requires no additional human-produced data. In repeated reference games involving photographs and tangram images, our method enables models to communicate efficiently with people: reducing the message length by up to 41% while increasing success by 15% over the course of the interaction. Human listeners respond faster when interacting with our model that forms conventions. We also show that training based on success or cost alone is insufficient - both are necessary to elicit convention formation.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.
Builds on
21 of 35 references.
References · 21
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 291
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
- 2020Multi-agent Communication meets Natural Language: Synergies between Functional and Structural Language Learningcited by 66
- 2023Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agentscited by 54
- 2019The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialoguecited by 46
- 2022Abstract Visual Reasoning with Tangram Shapescited by 43
- 2019Characterizing the dynamics of learning in repeated reference gamescited by 34
- 2021Few-shot Language Coordination by Modeling Theory of Mindcited by 32
9 more
- 2019Continual adaptation for efficient machine communicationcited by 28
- 2021From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of coordination and conventioncited by 27
- 2020Refer, Reuse, Reduce: Generating Subsequent References in Visual and Conversational Contextscited by 22
- 2024Talk Less, Interact Better: Evaluating In-context Conversational Adaptation in Multimodal LLMscited by 18
- 2024CoGen: Learning from Feedback with Coupled Comprehension and Generationcited by 7
- 2025Post-training for Efficient Communication via Convention Formationcited by 7
- 2019Learning Autocomplete Systems as a Communication Gamecited by 4
- 2025Vision-Language Model Dialog Games for Self-Improvementcited by 4
- 2025Playpen: An Environment for Exploring Learning Through Conversational Interactioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026LLMs and people both learn to form conventions -- just not with each othercited by 5
- 2026Investigating the Development of Task-Oriented Communication in Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026GlossoGen: Emergent Language in Complex Multi-Agent LLM Interactionscited by 1
- 2026Despite Instructions: Frontier Agents Improvise Covert Channels at Test Timecited by 1
- 2026Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventionscited by 0
- 2026Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretationcited by 0
- 2026On Language Drift during RLVR Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026On Language Drift during RLVR Post-Training1 Oct 2026
- 2026Despite Instructions: Frontier Agents Improvise Covert Channels at Test Time26 Sep 2026
- 2026GlossoGen: Emergent Language in Complex Multi-Agent LLM Interactions1 Sep 2026
- 2026Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation30 Aug 2026
- 2026Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventions6 Jun 2026
- 2026LLMs and people both learn to form conventions -- just not with each other9 Feb 2026
- 2026Investigating the Development of Task-Oriented Communication in Vision-Language Models28 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Improving Interpersonal Communication by Simulating Audiences with Language Models
- 2024How Many Parameters Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb? Evaluating Performance in Self-Play of Conversational Games as a Function of Model Characteristics
- 2026Cheap Talk Stabilizes Strategic Interaction in LLM Agents
- 2025Training Language Models for Social Deduction with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Communication Enhances LLMs' Stability in Strategic Thinking
- 2025Towards Developmentally Plausible Rewards: Communicative Success as a Learning Signal for Interactive Language Models
- 2026H2HMem: A Multimodal Memory Benchmark for Agents in Human-Human Interactions
- 2024Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions