mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Fairness and Prediction Error through Subspace Decomposition and Influence Analysis

arXiv 2510.23935 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models have achieved widespread success but often inherit and amplify historical biases, resulting in unfair outcomes. Traditional fairness methods typically impose constraints at the prediction level, without addressing underlying biases in data representations. In this work, we propose a principled framework that adjusts data representations to balance predictive utility and fairness. Using sufficient dimension reduction, we decompose the feature space into target-relevant, sensitive, and shared components, and control the fairness-utility trade-off by selectively removing sensitive information. We provide a theoretical analysis of how prediction error and fairness gaps evolve as shared subspaces are added, and employ influence functions to quantify their effects on the asymptotic behavior of parameter estimates. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate our theoretical insights and show that the proposed method effectively improves fairness while preserving predictive performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

21 of 53 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
  6. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  7. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  8. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  9. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  10. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 170
  11. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  12. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
9 more
  1. 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
  2. 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 98
  3. 2021Diverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Trainingcited by 48
  4. 2021Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Balanced Trainingcited by 34
  5. 2022Uncovering the Structural Fairness in Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 29
  6. 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
  7. 2023FAIRER: Fairness as Decision Rationale Alignmentcited by 12
  8. 2022Towards A Holistic View of Bias in Machine Learning: Bridging Algorithmic Fairness and Imbalanced Learningcited by 10
  9. 2024On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware Classifierscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.