On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness has become a crucial aspect in the development of trustworthy machine learning algorithms. Current fairness metrics to measure the violation of demographic parity have the following drawbacks: (i) the average difference of model predictions on two groups cannot reflect their distribution disparity, and (ii) the overall calculation along all possible predictions conceals the extreme local disparity at or around certain predictions. In this work, we propose a novel fairness metric called Maximal Cumulative ratio Disparity along varying Predictions' neighborhood (MCDP), for measuring the maximal local disparity of the fairness-aware classifiers. To accurately and efficiently calculate the MCDP, we develop a provably exact and an approximate calculation algorithm that greatly reduces the computational complexity with low estimation error. We further propose a bi-level optimization algorithm using a differentiable approximation of the MCDP for improving the algorithmic fairness. Extensive experiments on both tabular and image datasets validate that our fair training algorithm can achieve superior fairness-accuracy trade-offs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.
Builds on
43 of 79 references.
References · 43
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2020Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Designcited by 219
31 more
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
- 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
- 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
- 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
- 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
- 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
- 2022Learning Fair Node Representations with Graph Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 58
- 2021Fair Preprocessing: Towards Understanding Compositional Fairness of Data Transformers in Machine Learning Pipelinecited by 49
- 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
- 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
- 2023FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methodscited by 33
- 2022On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple Subgroupscited by 31
- 2018Active Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 27
- 2023Re-weighting Based Group Fairness Regularization via Classwise Robust Optimizationcited by 20
- 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
- 2022Counterfactual Fairness Is Basically Demographic Paritycited by 15
- 2023Improving Fair Training under Correlation Shiftscited by 14
- 2023Post-hoc Bias Scoring Is Optimal For Fair Classificationcited by 14
- 2020Towards Threshold Invariant Fair Classificationcited by 12
- 2023Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approachcited by 12
- 2022Learning Antidote Data to Individual Unfairnesscited by 8
- 2023Fair Classifiers that Abstain without Harmcited by 8
- 2023Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Anomaly Detectioncited by 7
- 2022Demographic Parity Constrained Minimax Optimal Regression under Linear Modelcited by 6
- 2023Adapting Fairness Interventions to Missing Valuescited by 5
- 2023Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairnesscited by 3
- 2023On the Fairness ROAD: Robust Optimization for Adversarial Debiasingcited by 3
- 2023Certification of Distributional Individual Fairnesscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.