mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards A Holistic View of Bias in Machine Learning: Bridging Algorithmic Fairness and Imbalanced Learning

arXiv 2207.06084 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) is playing an increasingly important role in rendering decisions that affect a broad range of groups in society. ML models inform decisions in criminal justice, the extension of credit in banking, and the hiring practices of corporations. This posits the requirement of model fairness, which holds that automated decisions should be equitable with respect to protected features (e.g., gender, race, or age) that are often under-represented in the data. We postulate that this problem of under-representation has a corollary to the problem of imbalanced data learning. This class imbalance is often reflected in both classes and protected features. For example, one class (those receiving credit) may be over-represented with respect to another class (those not receiving credit) and a particular group (females) may be under-represented with respect to another group (males). A key element in achieving algorithmic fairness with respect to protected groups is the simultaneous reduction of class and protected group imbalance in the underlying training data, which facilitates increases in both model accuracy and fairness. We discuss the importance of bridging imbalanced learning and group fairness by showing how key concepts in these fields overlap and complement each other; and propose a novel oversampling algorithm, Fair Oversampling, that addresses both skewed class distributions and protected features. Our method: (i) can be used as an efficient pre-processing algorithm for standard ML algorithms to jointly address imbalance and group equity; and (ii) can be combined with fairness-aware learning algorithms to improve their robustness to varying levels of class imbalance. Additionally, we take a step toward bridging the gap between fairness and imbalanced learning with a new metric, Fair Utility, that combines balanced accuracy with fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2022.

Builds on

36 of 99 references.

References · 36

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
  3. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  4. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  5. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  10. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  11. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 381
  12. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
24 more
  1. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  2. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  3. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 192
  4. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  5. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  6. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  7. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
  8. 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89
  9. 2020Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphscited by 74
  10. 2019Training individually fair ML models with Sensitive Subspace Robustnesscited by 73
  11. 2021DeepSMOTE: Fusing Deep Learning and SMOTE for Imbalanced Datacited by 64
  12. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  13. 2022A survey on learning from imbalanced data streams: taxonomy, challenges, empirical study, and reproducible experimental frameworkcited by 39
  14. 2017Oversampling for Imbalanced Learning Based on K-Means and SMOTEcited by 38
  15. 2022Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influencecited by 38
  16. 2020What Do You See? Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Interpretability through Neural Backdoorscited by 32
  17. 2021Fairness-aware Class Imbalanced Learningcited by 19
  18. 2020Individual Fairness Revisited: Transferring Techniques from Adversarial Robustnesscited by 17
  19. 2021Class-Incremental Experience Replay for Continual Learning under Concept Driftcited by 17
  20. 2019LoRAS: An oversampling approach for imbalanced datasetscited by 15
  21. 2018A Cost-Sensitive Deep Belief Network for Imbalanced Classificationcited by 12
  22. 2021Addressing Fairness, Bias and Class Imbalance in Machine Learning: the FBI-losscited by 6
  23. 2015Exposing the Probabilistic Causal Structure of Discriminationcited by 5
  24. 2019WOTBoost: Weighted Oversampling Technique in Boosting for imbalanced learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 3.

10 papers.