On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy optimization (PO) is a cornerstone of modern reinforcement learning (RL), with diverse applications spanning robotics, healthcare, and large language model training. The increasing deployment of PO in sensitive domains, however, raises significant privacy concerns. In this paper, we initiate a theoretical study of differentially private policy optimization, focusing explicitly on its sample complexity. We first formalize an appropriate definition of differential privacy (DP) tailored to PO, addressing the inherent challenges arising from on-policy learning dynamics and the subtlety involved in defining the unit of privacy. We then systematically analyze the sample complexity of widely-used PO algorithms, including policy gradient (PG), natural policy gradient (NPG) and more, under DP constraints and various settings, via a unified framework. Our theoretical results demonstrate that privacy costs can often manifest as lower-order terms in the sample complexity, while also highlighting subtle yet important observations in private PO settings. These offer valuable practical insights for privacy-preserving PO algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
55 of 74 references.
References · 55
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 208
- 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 203
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 183
- 2022Hybrid RL: Using Both Offline and Online Data Can Make RL Efficientcited by 158
- 2019Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergencecited by 157
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
- 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
38 more
- 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 113
- 2018Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 103
- 2020PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient Learningcited by 91
- 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
- 2018Differentially Private Contextual Linear Banditscited by 82
- 2020Optimistic Policy Optimization with Bandit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2021A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradientcited by 74
- 2024REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewardscited by 66
- 2022An Improved Analysis of (Variance-Reduced) Policy Gradient and Natural Policy Gradient Methodscited by 63
- 2018Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domaincited by 60
- 2021Cautiously Optimistic Policy Optimization and Exploration with Linear Function Approximationcited by 53
- 2020Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guaranteescited by 51
- 2021Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 51
- 2022Linear Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Log-Linear Policiescited by 44
- 2019Neural Proximal/Trust Region Policy Optimization Attains Globally Optimal Policycited by 42
- 2019An Optimal Private Stochastic-MAB Algorithm Based on an Optimal Private Stopping Rulecited by 37
- 2020Multi-Armed Bandits with Local Differential Privacycited by 37
- 2022Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimizationcited by 32
- 2021Private Federated Learning Without a Trusted Server: Optimal Algorithms for Convex Lossescited by 30
- 2024Regressing the Relative Future: Efficient Policy Optimization for Multi-turn RLHFcited by 29
- 2022Shuffle Private Linear Contextual Banditscited by 27
- 2020Private Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization: Adaptive Algorithms and Tighter Generalization Boundscited by 26
- 2013Private Matchings and Allocationscited by 23
- 2021On the Global Optimum Convergence of Momentum-based Policy Gradientcited by 23
- 2021Differentially Private Regret Minimization in Episodic Markov Decision Processescited by 23
- 2022Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 22
- 2021Private Non-smooth Empirical Risk Minimization and Stochastic Convex Optimization in Subquadratic Stepscited by 21
- 2016Differentially Private Policy Evaluationcited by 19
- 2023Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2022Near-Optimal Differentially Private Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2022Distributed Differential Privacy in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 14
- 2023On Differentially Private Federated Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
- 2023Optimistic Natural Policy Gradient: a Simple Efficient Policy Optimization Framework for Online RLcited by 13
- 2023Private (Stochastic) Non-Convex Optimization Revisited: Second-Order Stationary Points and Excess Riskscited by 12
- 2021Differentially Private Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representationcited by 11
- 2024Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimationcited by 11
- 2020Spoiled for Choice? Personalized Recommendation for Healthcare Decisions: A Multi-Armed Bandit Approachcited by 10
- 2024Private Heterogeneous Federated Learning Without a Trusted Server Revisited: Error-Optimal and Communication-Efficient Algorithms for Convex Lossescited by 8
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.