mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Private Matchings and Allocations

arXiv 1311.2828 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2013cs.GT cs.CR cs.DScited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a private variant of the classical allocation problem: given k goods and n agents with individual, private valuation functions over bundles of goods, how can we partition the goods amongst the agents to maximize social welfare? An important special case is when each agent desires at most one good, and specifies her (private) value for each good: in this case, the problem is exactly the maximum-weight matching problem in a bipartite graph. Private matching and allocation problems have not been considered in the differential privacy literature, and for good reason: they are plainly impossible to solve under differential privacy. Informally, the allocation must match agents to their preferred goods in order to maximize social welfare, but this preference is exactly what agents wish to hide. Therefore, we consider the problem under the relaxed constraint of joint differential privacy: for any agent i, no coalition of agents excluding i should be able to learn about the valuation function of agent i. In this setting, the full allocation is no longer published---instead, each agent is told what good to get. We first show that with a small number of identical copies of each good, it is possible to efficiently and accurately solve the maximum weight matching problem while guaranteeing joint differential privacy. We then consider the more general allocation problem, when bidder valuations satisfy the gross substitutes condition. Finally, we prove that the allocation problem cannot be solved to non-trivial accuracy under joint differential privacy without requiring multiple copies of each type of good.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Federated f-Differential Privacycited by 29
  2. 2022Shuffle Private Linear Contextual Banditscited by 27
  3. 2021Differentially Private Regret Minimization in Episodic Markov Decision Processescited by 23
  4. 2022Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated Learningcited by 23
  5. 2022Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 22
  6. 2022Near-Optimal Differentially Private Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  7. 2023Share Your Representation Only: Guaranteed Improvement of the Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Federated Learningcited by 13
  8. 2021Privately Publishable Per-instance Privacycited by 12
  9. 2021Private Multi-Task Learning: Formulation and Applications to Federated Learningcited by 11
  10. 2021Differentially Private Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representationcited by 11
  11. 2022Improved Regret for Differentially Private Exploration in Linear MDPcited by 8
  12. 2021Adaptive Control of Differentially Private Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 7
11 more
  1. 2023Differentially Private Episodic Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-tailed Rewardscited by 4
  2. 2022Differentially Private Condorcet Votingcited by 3
  3. 2025On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy Optimizationcited by 3
  4. 2022Truthful Generalized Linear Modelscited by 1
  5. 2024Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-Playcited by 1
  6. 2024Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Shuffle Differential Privacycited by 1
  7. 2023Differentially Private Online Item Pricingcited by 0
  8. 2023Learning across Data Owners with Joint Differential Privacycited by 0
  9. 2024Differentially Private High Dimensional Banditscited by 0
  10. 2025Towards Optimal Differentially Private Regret Bounds in Linear MDPscited by 0
  11. 2026Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration itself is Joint Differentially Privatecited by 0