Fine-tuning Flow Matching Generative Models with Intermediate Feedback
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Flow-based generative models have shown remarkable success in text-to-image generation, yet fine-tuning them with intermediate feedback remains challenging, especially for continuous-time flow matching models. Most existing approaches solely learn from outcome rewards, struggling with the credit assignment problem. Alternative methods that attempt to learn a critic via direct regression on cumulative rewards often face training instabilities and model collapse in online settings. We present AC-Flow, a robust actor-critic framework that addresses these challenges through three key innovations: (1) reward shaping that provides well-normalized learning signals to enable stable intermediate value learning and gradient control, (2) a novel dual-stability mechanism that combines advantage clipping to prevent destructive policy updates with a warm-up phase that allows the critic to mature before influencing the actor, and (3) a scalable generalized critic weighting scheme that extends traditional reward-weighted methods while preserving model diversity through Wasserstein regularization. Through extensive experiments on Stable Diffusion 3, we demonstrate that AC-Flow achieves state-of-the-art performance in text-to-image alignment tasks and generalization to unseen human preference models. Our results demonstrate that even with a computationally efficient critic model, we can robustly finetune flow models without compromising generative quality, diversity, or stability.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 47 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
47 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Online Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning of Flow Matching with Wasserstein Regularization9 Feb
- 2025Flow Q-Learning4 Feb
- 2024Adjoint Matching: Fine-tuning Flow and Diffusion Generative Models with Memoryless Stochastic Optimal Control13 Sep
- 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization21 Nov
- 2023Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards29 Sep
- 2023DPOK: Reinforcement Learning for Fine-tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models25 May
- 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning22 May
Other references · 40
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
28 more
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
- 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
- 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Lawscited by 127
- 2024Derivative-Free Guidance in Continuous and Discrete Diffusion Models with Soft Value-Based Decodingcited by 127
- 2020Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward Shapingcited by 112
- 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
- 2024Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Need Not Retain Offline Datacited by 58
- 2025SP-VLA: A Joint Model Scheduling and Token Pruning Approach for VLA Model Accelerationcited by 56
- 2024Sequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein Backbone Generationcited by 36
- 2023Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 32
- 2023Learnable Behavior Control: Breaking Atari Human World Records via Sample-Efficient Behavior Selectioncited by 14
- 2021A Review for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Atari:Benchmarks, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 12
- 2022Generalized Data Distribution Iterationcited by 12
- 2024PRANCE: Joint Token-Optimization and Structural Channel-Pruning for Adaptive ViT Inferencecited by 10
- 2024Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equations via Consistency with Perturbation Processcited by 8
- 2021An Entropy Regularization Free Mechanism for Policy-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2025Variational Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 5
- 2025ProteinZero: Self-Improving Protein Generation via Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2020Critic PI2: Master Continuous Planning via Policy Improvement with Path Integrals and Deep Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2023ConvFormer: Revisiting Transformer for Sequential User Modelingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025DistDF: Time-Series Forecasting Needs Joint-Distribution Wasserstein Alignmentcited by 13
- 2026UniGRPO: Unified Policy Optimization for Reasoning-Driven Visual Generationcited by 11
- 2026Gradual Fine-Tuning for Flow Matching Modelscited by 0
- 2026AdvantageFlow: Advantage-Weighted Least Squares for RL in Flow Modelscited by 0
- 2026AdvantageFlow: Advantage-Weighted Least Squares for RL in Flow Models25 May 2026
- 2026UniGRPO: Unified Policy Optimization for Reasoning-Driven Visual Generation24 Mar 2026
- 2026Gradual Fine-Tuning for Flow Matching Models30 Jan 2026
- 2025DistDF: Time-Series Forecasting Needs Joint-Distribution Wasserstein Alignment28 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Value Gradient Guidance for Flow Matching Alignment
- 2026Faster and Better Alignment for Flow Matching Models via Step-aware Advantages
- 2025SuperFlow: Training Flow Matching Models with RL on the Fly
- 2026LeapAlign: Post-Training Flow Matching Models at Any Generation Step by Building Two-Step Trajectories
- 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL
- 2026Flow-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Flow Matching Models
- 2026How to Guide Your Flow: Few-Step Alignment via Flow Map Reward Guidance
- 2026Exploring the Design Space of Reward Backpropagation for Flow Matching