A Principle of Targeted Intervention for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Steering cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) towards desired outcomes is challenging, particularly when the global guidance from a human on the whole multi-agent system is impractical in a large-scale MARL. On the other hand, designing external mechanisms (e.g., intrinsic rewards and human feedback) to coordinate agents mostly relies on empirical studies, lacking a easy-to-use research tool. In this work, we employ multi-agent influence diagrams (MAIDs) as a graphical framework to address the above issues. First, we introduce the concept of MARL interaction paradigms (orthogonal to MARL learning paradigms), using MAIDs to analyze and visualize both unguided self-organization and global guidance mechanisms in MARL. Then, we design a new MARL interaction paradigm, referred to as the targeted intervention paradigm that is applied to only a single targeted agent, so the problem of global guidance can be mitigated. In implementation, we introduce a causal inference technique, referred to as Pre-Strategy Intervention (PSI), to realize the targeted intervention paradigm. Since MAIDs can be regarded as a special class of causal diagrams, a composite desired outcome that integrates the primary task goal and an additional desired outcome can be achieved by maximizing the corresponding causal effect through the PSI. Moreover, the bundled relevance graph analysis of MAIDs provides a tool to identify whether an MARL learning paradigm is workable under the design of an MARL interaction paradigm. In experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed targeted intervention, and verify the result of relevance graph analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
53 of 96 references.
References · 53
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
- 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 345
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
38 more
- 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 248
- 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 214
- 2019The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Researchcited by 194
- 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2019A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Languagecited by 154
- 2022Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: Problems and Solutionscited by 145
- 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
- 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 135
- 2018On Learning Intrinsic Rewards for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 100
- 2019Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
- 2020Autotelic Agents with Intrinsically Motivated Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: a Short Surveycited by 83
- 2024Robust agents learn causal world modelscited by 81
- 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
- 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learningcited by 71
- 2023Language Instructed Reinforcement Learning for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 61
- 2021Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Active Voltage Control on Power Distribution Networkscited by 52
- 2021Episodic Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning with Curiosity-Driven Explorationcited by 49
- 2019Hierarchical Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Skill Discoverycited by 42
- 2023Honesty Is the Best Policy: Defining and Mitigating AI Deceptioncited by 40
- 2023Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 30
- 2024Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Model Priorscited by 30
- 2022Discovering Agentscited by 28
- 2020Learning to Locomote: Understanding How Environment Design Matters for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2020Novelty Search in Representational Space for Sample Efficient Explorationcited by 26
- 2024Learning to Learn Faster from Human Feedback with Language Model Predictive Controlcited by 25
- 2013Graphical Models for Game Theorycited by 21
- 2018Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry riskscited by 21
- 2023Reasoning about Causality in Gamescited by 20
- 2022LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2020KoGuN: Accelerating Deep Reinforcement Learning via Integrating Human Suboptimal Knowledgecited by 13
- 2023Learning Safe Control for Multi-Robot Systems: Methods, Verification, and Open Challengescited by 12
- 2025M3HF: Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning from Multi-phase Human Feedback of Mixed Qualitycited by 11
- 2013Understanding Incentives: Mechanism Design becomes Algorithm Designcited by 10
- 2022Human-AI Coordination via Human-Regularized Search and Learningcited by 8
- 2025The impact of intrinsic rewards on exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2024Measuring Goal-Directednesscited by 7
- 2023Constrained Environment Optimization for Prioritized Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 6
- 2024Open Ad Hoc Teamwork with Cooperative Game Theorycited by 6
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Designcited by 2
- 2026Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligencecited by 1
- 2026FinInvest-GTCN: Explainable Graph-Temporal-Causal Modeling for Risk-Aware Investment Decision Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence21 Aug 2026
- 2026FinInvest-GTCN: Explainable Graph-Temporal-Causal Modeling for Risk-Aware Investment Decision Optimization27 Jun 2026
- 2026The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Design2 May 2026