RL makes MLLMs see better than SFT
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
A dominant assumption in Multimodal Language Model (MLLM) research is that its performance is largely inherited from the LLM backbone, given its immense parameter scale and remarkable capabilities. This has created a void in the understanding of the vision encoder, which determines how MLLMs perceive images. The recent shift in MLLM training paradigms, from Supervised Finetuning (SFT) to Reinforcement Learning (RL), magnifies this oversight-namely, the significant lack of analysis on how such training reshapes the vision encoder as well as the MLLM. To address this, we first investigate the impact of training strategies on MLLMs, where RL shows a clear advantage over SFT in strongly vision-related VQA benchmarks. Motivated by this, we conduct a critical yet under-explored analysis of the vision encoder of MLLMs through diverse and in-depth experiments, ranging from ImageNet classification and segmentation to gradient visualization. Our results demonstrate that MLLM's post-training strategy (i.e., SFT or RL) not only leads to distinct outcomes on MLLM downstream tasks, but also fundamentally reshapes MLLM's underlying visual representations. Specifically, the key finding of our study is that RL produces stronger and precisely localized visual representations compared to SFT, boosting the ability of the vision encoder for MLLM. We then reframe our findings into a simple recipe for building strong vision encoders for MLLMs, Preference-Instructed Vision OpTimization (PIVOT). When integrated into MLLMs, a PIVOT-trained vision encoder outperforms even larger and more heavily-trained counterparts, despite requiring less than 1% of the computational cost of standard vision pretraining. This result opens an effective and efficient path for advancing the vision backbones of MLLMs. Project page available at https://june-page.github.io/pivot/
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 101 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
101 of 112 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model10 Apr
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning16 May
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model6 Mar
Other references · 98
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
38 more
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
50 most cited of 98 All 98 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme
- 2026When Does RL Help Medical VLMs? Disentangling Vision, SFT, and RL Gains
- 2024Are Bigger Encoders Always Better in Vision Large Models?
- 2025Perception-R1: Advancing Multimodal Reasoning Capabilities of MLLMs via Visual Perception Reward
- 2025Investigating Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models with Multiple Vision Encoders
- 2024Elevating Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs with Visual Embedding Distillation
- 2026Why Does RL Generalize Better Than SFT? A Data-Centric Perspective on VLM Post-Training
- 2025Perception Before Reasoning: Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoning in Vision-Language Models