mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RLSR: Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Reward Outperforms SFT in Instruction Following

arXiv 2510.14200 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

After the pretraining stage of LLMs, techniques such as SFT, RLHF, RLVR, and RFT are applied to enhance instruction-following ability, mitigate undesired responses, improve reasoning capability and enable efficient domain adaptation with minimal data. SFT relies on the next-token prediction objective to strengthen instruction following in a base model using a large corpus of human-labeled responses. In contrast, RFT employs a RL-based approach to adapt fine-tuned reasoning models to specific domains with limited supervision. Inspired by RFT, we propose replacing SFT with RLSR to leverage the extensive SFT dataset in an RL framework, thereby improving the base model's instruction-following ability. In RLSR, the base model generates multiple responses for each prompt, and reward scores are computed as the cosine similarity in the semantic embedding space between the generated and human-labeled responses. RLSR can be utilized in multiple ways. It can directly replace SFT, achieving superior performance on instruction-following benchmarks-for example, RLSR (SB) on Qwen-7B (INFINITY) achieved an AlpacaEval win rate of 26.34%, surpassing SFT's 21.01%. Furthermore, combining SFT and RLSR further enhances downstream task performance; Qwen-7B (INFINITY) achieved a win rate of 30.73% when trained with SFT + RLSR.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  8. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  9. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  10. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  11. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  12. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
4 more
  1. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  2. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  3. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  4. 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective
  2. 2025Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection
  3. 2025Beyond the Trade-off: Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Models' Instruction Following
  4. 2025Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle
  5. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
  6. 2025Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM Reasoning
  7. 2025BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction following
  8. 2024TeaMs-RL: Teaching LLMs to Generate Better Instruction Datasets via Reinforcement Learning